首页> 外文期刊>Communication Theory >Active Audiences? The Debate Progresses But Is Far From Resolved
【24h】

Active Audiences? The Debate Progresses But Is Far From Resolved

机译:积极的观众?辩论正在进行,但远未解决

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The study of media audiences has long been hotly contested regarding their supposed power to construct shared meanings, to mitigate or moderate media influences, or to complete or resist the circuit of culture. Transformations in the media environment add further grounds for contestation over audience activity or passivity, so-called, given the increasing mediation and digitalization of all dimensions of modern societies. Yet despite such persistent contestation, audiences are often taken for granted within communication theory as, implicitly, an invisible and indivisible mass. The article notes that the audience projectand thus a grounded recognition of significance of ordinary people's collective and individual experiences of living in a digital ageseemingly must be reasserted for each generation of scholarship, rearticulating their role in relation to each new phase of sociotechnological change and, perhaps most interesting, reflexively rethinking audiencing as the very conditions of modernity are globally reconfigured. After reflecting on the possibility that Western audience researchers have come to take for granted the wider context of audiences' lives, the article observes that one benefit of globalization is a renewed necessity for researchers to articulate that which is taken for granted and thus seek ways to reinsert audiences into the wider analysis of the circuit of culture.
机译:对于媒体受众的研究,长期以来一直在争夺他们建构共同意义,减轻或缓和媒体影响,或完成或抵抗文化循环的假定力量。鉴于现代社会各个层面的调解和数字化日益增多,媒体环境的转变为争夺观众活动或消极情绪提供了更多的理由。尽管存在这种持续的竞争,但在传播理论中,观众通常被视作一个无形和不可分割的群体。这篇文章指出,对于每一代学者,似乎都必须重申听众的计划,并因此有理由对普通人在数字时代生活的集体和个人经验的重要性有一个基础的认识,重新确立他们在社会技术变革的每个新阶段中的作用,也许最有趣的是,反思性地重新考虑了听众,因为全球性都在重新配置了现代性的条件。在思考了西方听众研究者已经将视听者生活的更广泛背景视为理所当然的可能性之后,文章指出,全球化的好处之一是研究者重新阐明被认为是理所当然的事物的必要性,从而寻求解决方法。使观众重新进入对文化循环的更广泛分析。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Communication Theory》 |2015年第4期|439-446|共8页
  • 作者

    Livingstone Sonia;

  • 作者单位

    Univ London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Media & Commun, London WC2A 2AE, England;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号