首页> 外文期刊>Communication research >Not Funny? The Effects of Factual Versus Sarcastic Journalistic Responses to Uncivil User Comments
【24h】

Not Funny? The Effects of Factual Versus Sarcastic Journalistic Responses to Uncivil User Comments

机译:不好笑?事实与讽刺的新闻反应对未经染色用户评论的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Incivility in user comments on news websites has been discussed as a significant problem of online participation. Previous research suggests that news outlets should tackle this problem by interactively moderating uncivil postings and asking their authors to discuss more civilized. We argue that this kind of interactive comment moderation as well as different response styles to uncivil comments (i.e., factual vs. sarcastic) differently affect observers' evaluations of the discussion atmosphere, the credibility of the news outlet, the quality of its stories, and ultimately observers' willingness to participate in the discussions. Results from an online experiment show that factual responses to uncivil comments indirectly increase participation rates by suggesting a deliberative discussion atmosphere. In contrast, sarcastic responses indirectly deteriorate participation rates due to a decrease in the credibility of the news outlet and the quality of its stories. Sarcastic responses however increase the entertainment value of the discussions.
机译:在用户评论中的缺乏已被讨论在线参与的重大问题。以前的研究表明,新闻网点应该通过交互式抚养未经宣传的帖子并要求他们的作者讨论更为文明的讨论。我们认为这种互动评论审核以及不同的反应风格,对未经核查评论(即事实与讽刺)不同地影响观察员对讨论氛围的评价,新闻出口的可信度,其故事的质量和最终观察人们愿意参加讨论。在线实验结果表明,通过建议审议讨论氛围,对未经缺乏内容评论的事实反应间接增加参与率。相比之下,由于新闻出口的可信度和其故事的质量下降,讽刺响应是间接恶化的参与率。然而,讽刺响应增加了讨论的娱乐价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号