...
首页> 外文期刊>Communication Research and Practice >Political citizens, consumers, or passive patients? Imagined audiences in the complementary medicine debate
【24h】

Political citizens, consumers, or passive patients? Imagined audiences in the complementary medicine debate

机译:政治公民,消费者或被动患者? 互补医学辩论中的想象的受众

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This is a content analysis (2011 -2017) of news stories referring to an Australian-based lobby group called the Friends of Science in Medicine (FSM) who have been active in their denouncement of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in Australia. Of particular interest are the models of biocommunicability that dominated these news stories. Drawing from the works of Briggs and Hallin, these biocommunicability models enable us to consider whether the news story imagines its audience as passive patients, active patient-consumers, or engaged citizens in the public sphere. Of 76 articles, public sphere stories were the most frequent (n=54) followed by patient-consumer reports (n=36). Prioritising the voices of FSM lobbyists, news stories address their audiences as politically astute citizens or active consumers negotiating a range of healthcare options in an ambiguous healthcare landscape. These models correlate with framings of CAM as lucrative and unethical, illegitimate, with a poor evidence base.
机译:这是一个内容分析(2011 -2017)的新闻故事,指的是澳大利亚的大厅集团称为医学(FSM)的友谊赛,他们在澳大利亚谴责互补和替代医学(CAM)的谴责。特别感兴趣的是占据这些新闻报道的生物通信的模型。从Briggs和Hallin的作品中绘制,这些生物通信能力模型使我们能够考虑新闻故事是否将其受众视为被动患者,积极的患者 - 消费者或公共领域的公民。在76篇文章中,公共领域故事是最常见的(n = 54),然后是患者 - 消费者报告(n = 36)。优先考虑FSM Lobbyser的声音,新闻报道将其受众视为政治上的精明公民或积极的消费者,谈判一系列暧昧的医疗保健景观。这些模型与凸轮的框架相关,作为利润丰厚,不道德,非法的,证据基础差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号