...
首页> 外文期刊>Commonwealth Law Bulletin >Judicial assistance to small jurisdictions in the Commonwealth: the case for a special chapter and forum
【24h】

Judicial assistance to small jurisdictions in the Commonwealth: the case for a special chapter and forum

机译:对英联邦小管辖区的司法协助:专门章节和论坛的案例

获取原文
           

摘要

The objective of this article is to make a special case for small jurisdictions when it comes to the question of judicial assistance by the establishment of a special forum, i.e. the establishment of a special chapter of common concerns with a vision and a road map relevant to the small jurisdictions themselves. It argues that judicial assistance to small states should go well beyond conventional judicial assistance focused on judicial personnel, including not only the conventional but also extending beyond. Conventional judicial personnel development should be coupled with institutional empowerment and system development if judicial assistance is to be of any real value to small states.Small states have specificities proper to themselves. Not to attend to those specificities whether in an up-front and/or complementary manner is to render whatever judicial personnel development programmes are given to them academic, theoretical and of little practical value in their context. Conversely, to address and to attend to those specificities will bring about the long-awaited institutional update and system development of their judiciaries and render judicial personnel development programmes relevant. Small states, by the very nature of their plight, have a right to be assisted in institutional update and systems development to the same extent that they have a right to be assisted in personnel development programmes. That right stems from a larger right: that is, to participate and join in the mainstream of the global justice system which is in the making. Many small states do not appear in that fast forward trend, as of today, trapped in their unique constraints.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03050718.2011.621269
机译:本文的目的是通过建立一个专门论坛,在涉及司法协助的问题上,为小司法管辖区提供一个特殊案例,即建立一个共同关注的特别章节,并提出与之相关的愿景和路线图。小司法管辖区本身。它认为,对小国的司法援助应该远远超过以司法人员为重点的常规司法援助,不仅包括常规司法援助,而且还应包括其他方面。如果司法援助要对小国具有任何实际价值,那么常规司法人员的发展应与机构授权和系统发展相结合。小国具有适合自己的特点。无论是以预先的和/或补充的方式来处理这些特殊性,都是要使给予司法人员的任何发展计划在其背景下具有学术性,理论性和实用价值。相反,解决和关注这些特殊性将带来人们期待已久的司法机构的机构更新和系统发展,并使司法人员发展计划具有相关性。小国就其困境而言,有权在机构更新和系统发展方面得到协助,其程度与他们有权在人员发展计划中得到帮助的程度相同。该权利源自一项更大的权利:即参与并加入正在形成的全球司法体系的主流。截至今天,许多小州还没有出现在其快速发展趋势中,受困于其独特的局限性。查看全文下载全文相关变量add add_id ,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more“,发布编号:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03050718.2011.621269

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号