首页> 外文期刊>Combustion Science and Technology >COMPARISON OF CHARACTERISTIC TIME DIAGNOSTICS FOR IGNITION AND OXIDATION OF FUEL/OXIDIZER MIXTURES BEHIND REFLECTED SHOCK WAVES
【24h】

COMPARISON OF CHARACTERISTIC TIME DIAGNOSTICS FOR IGNITION AND OXIDATION OF FUEL/OXIDIZER MIXTURES BEHIND REFLECTED SHOCK WAVES

机译:反射冲击波后燃料/氧化剂混合物点火和氧化特征时间诊断的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Various methods for determining characteristic times of shock-tube ignition and oxidation are compared. Onset and peak times were obtained from time histories for four different species (CH, CH~*, OH, OH~*) as predicted by a modern detailed kinetics mechanism. Appropriate submechanisms for CH~* and OH~* formation and quenching were added to the existing mechanism to differentiate the excited-state species from the ground-state molecules. The modeling focused on mixtures of acetylene or ethane with oxygen highly diluted in argon at high temperatures (1200-2050 K) and nearly atmospheric pressures. Using a detailed mechanism known to accurately simulate the shock-tube chemistry, emphasis was placed on cohesion of characteristic times among the species and the extent to which one may be used to predict another. Generally, ignition onset times were found to be more consistent than peak times, with OH peaking at times least typical of the group. Onset time versus inverse temperature curves based on any one species agree with those of the other three species to within 25% for the hydrocarbon mixtures and given mechanism utilized herein. Results suggest that ignition onset time should be used for greater consistency, and kinetics modeling of excited-state species such as OH~* and CH~* should be included if comparing to data obtained using chemilumi-nescence diagnostics.
机译:比较了确定冲击管着火和氧化特征时间的各种方法。通过现代详细的动力学机制预测,从四种不同物种(CH,CH〜*,OH,OH〜*)的时间历史记录中获得了发病时间和高峰时间。 CH〜*和OH〜*形成和淬灭的适当子机制已添加到现有机制中,以区分激发态物质和基态分子。该模型的重点是在高温(1200-2050 K)和接近大气压的条件下,乙炔或乙烷与氧气在氩气中高度稀释的混合物。使用已知的精确机制来精确模拟激波管化学反应,重点放在物种之间特征时间的凝聚力以及一个物种可用来预测另一个物种的程度。通常,发现起燃时间比峰值时间更一致,OH峰值至少是该组的典型时间。基于任何一种的起始时间对逆温曲线与其他三种的一致,对于烃混合物和本文所用的给定机理而言,在25%以内。结果表明,应使用点火开始时间来获得更大的一致性,并且如果与使用化学发光诊断程序获得的数据进行比较,则应包括激发态物质(如OH〜*和CH〜*)的动力学模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号