...
首页> 外文期刊>Combustion and Flame >Eulerian particle flamelet modeling of a bluff-body CH_4/H_2 flame
【24h】

Eulerian particle flamelet modeling of a bluff-body CH_4/H_2 flame

机译:钝体CH_4 / H_2火焰的欧拉粒子小火焰建模

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In this paper an axisymmetric RANS simulation of a bluff-body stabilized flame has been attempted using steady and unsteady flamelet models. The unsteady effects are considered in a postprocessing manner through the Eulerian particle flamelet model (EPFM). In this model the transient history of scalar dissipation rate, conditioned by stoichiometric mixture fraction, is required to generate unsteady flamelets and is obtained by tracing Eulerian particles. In this approach unsteady convective-diffusive transport equations are solved to consider the transport of Eulerian particles in the domain. Comparisons of the results of steady and unsteady calculations show that transient effects do not have much influence on major species, including OH, and the structure of the flame therefore can be successfully predicted by steady or unsteady approaches. However, it appears that slow processes such as NO formation can only be captured accurately if unsteady effects are taken into account, while steady simulations tend to overpredict NO. In this work turbulence has been modeled using the Reynolds stress model. Predictions of velocity, velocity rms, mean mixture fraction, and its rms show very good agreement with experiments. Performance of three detailed chemical mechanisms, the GRI Mech 2.11, the San Diego mechanism, and the GRI Mech 3.0, has also been evaluated in this study. All three mechanisms performed well with both steady and unsteady approaches and produced almost identical results for major species and OH. However, the difference between mechanisms and flamelet models becomes clearly apparent in the NO predictions. The unsteady model incorporating the GRI Mech 2.11 provided better predictions of NO than steady calculations and showed close agreement with experiments. The other two mechanisms showed overpredictions of NO with both unsteady and steady models. The level of overprediction is severe with the steady approach. GRI Mech 3.0 appears to over-predict NO by a factor of 2 compared to GRI Mech 2.11. The NO predictions by the San Diego mechanism fall between those of the two GRI mechanisms. The present study demonstrates the success of the EPFM model and when used with the GRI 2.11 mechanism predicts all flame properties and major and minor species very well, and most importantly the correct NO levels.
机译:在本文中,尝试使用稳态和非稳态小火焰模型对钝体稳定火焰进行轴对称RANS模拟。通过欧拉粒子小火焰模型(EPFM)以后处理方式考虑了非稳态影响。在该模型中,标量耗散率的瞬态历史受化学计量混合分数限制,是产生不稳定小火焰所必需的,并且可以通过追踪欧拉粒子来获得。在这种方法中,求解非稳态对流扩散扩散方程以考虑欧拉粒子在域中的传输。稳态和非稳态计算结果的比较表明,瞬变效应对主要物质(包括OH)的影响不大,因此可以通过稳态或非稳态方法成功预测火焰的结构。但是,似乎只有在考虑到不稳定影响的情况下,才能准确地捕获诸如NO形成等缓慢过程,而稳定的模拟往往会高估NO。在这项工作中,使用雷诺应力模型对湍流进行了建模。速度,速度均方根值,平均混合分数及其均方根值的预测与实验非常吻合。这项研究还评估了三种详细的化学机理的性能,即GRI Mech 2.11,San Diego机理和GRI Mech 3.0。这三种机制在稳定和不稳定方法下均表现良好,并且对主要物种和OH产生的结果几乎相同。但是,在NO预测中,机理和火焰模型之间的差异变得显而易见。包含GRI Mech 2.11的非稳态模型提供了比稳态计算更好的NO预测,并且与实验非常吻合。其他两种机制在非稳态模型和稳态模型中均显示出NO的高估。采用稳定方法时,过度预测的水平很严重。与GRI Mech 2.11相比,GRI Mech 3.0似乎将NO高估了2倍。圣地亚哥机制的NO预测介于两个GRI机制的NO预测之间。本研究证明了EPFM模型的成功,当与GRI 2.11机制一起使用时,可以很好地预测所有火焰特性以及主要和次要种类,最重要的是可以正确确定NO水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号