首页> 外文期刊>Combustion and Flame >A detailed comparison of two sub-grid scale combustion models via large eddy simulation of the PRECCINSTA gas turbine model combustor
【24h】

A detailed comparison of two sub-grid scale combustion models via large eddy simulation of the PRECCINSTA gas turbine model combustor

机译:通过PRECCINSTA燃气轮机模型燃烧器的大涡模拟,详细比较了两个子网格规模的燃烧模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A detailed comparison of the performances of a dynamically thickened-flame (DTF) model and a flame surface density (FSD) model is conducted through large eddy simulation (LES) of two fuel-lean turbulent premixed swirling flames in the well-known PRECCINSTA gas turbine model combustor. The two models are implemented in the same in-house Finite-Volume code, with the same numerical method, and all the computations are performed on the same block-structured body-fitted curvilinear grid. Very good agreement between the LES and experimental data is obtained. It shows that for predicting the statistics of velocity, temperature and major species, both the FSD model and the DTF model predict very similar results for the flames under consideration. However, for predicting the distributions of minor species CO the FSD model performs less good as the DTF model, which is analysed to be result from the strategy used to generate the chemistry look up table for the FSD simulation. The coherent flow structures, the flame surface area as well as the power spectra density of velocities are also analysed and compared. The present analysis of the resolved flame surface area might be the first one in the literature of LES of turbulent premixed flame. With the employed model constants, the FSD model yields an approximately 1.4 times as large flame front surface area as the DTF model does. It is also interesting to find that the resolved flame surface area by FSD model is approximately 44% of the real flame surface area for the case phi = 0.75, while for the DTF model the value is around 31%. Additionally, a cross-comparison with results in the literature is performed as well and the present LES results are as good as those obtained in the literature. (C) 2015 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:通过对著名的PRECCINSTA气体中的两种贫燃料湍流预混涡旋火焰进行大涡模拟(LES),对动态加厚火焰(DTF)模型和火焰表面密度(FSD)模型的性能进行了详细的比较。涡轮模型燃烧器。这两个模型在相同的内部有限体积代码中以相同的数值方法实现,并且所有计算都在相同的块结构体拟合曲线网格上执行。 LES和实验数据之间取得了很好的一致性。它表明,对于预测速度,温度和主要物质的统计数据,FSD模型和DTF模型都针对所考虑的火焰预测了非常相似的结果。但是,为了预测次要物种CO的分布,FSD模型的表现不如DTF模型好,据分析,这是由用于为FSD模拟生成化学查找表的策略得出的。还分析并比较了相干流动结构,火焰表面积以及速度的功率谱密度。解析的火焰表面积的当前分析可能是湍流预混火焰LES文献中的第一个。利用所采用的模型常数,FSD模型产生的火焰前表面积约为DTF模型的1.4倍。还有趣的是,对于phi = 0.75,FSD模型解析的火焰表面积约为实际火焰表面积的44%,而对于DTF模型,该值约为31%。另外,还与文献中的结果进行了交叉比较,目前的LES结果与文献中的结果一样好。 (C)2015年燃烧研究所。由Elsevier Inc.出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号