Experimental study of concurrent-flow flame spread over thin solids in confined space in microgravity

摘要

Concurrent flow flame spread experiments are conducted over thermally thin solid fuels in micrograv-ity aboard the International Space Station (ISS) under varying levels of confinement. Samples of cotton fiberglass blended textile fabric are burned in air flows in a small flow duct. Baffles are placed parallel to the sample sheet, one on each side symmetrically. The distance between the baffles is varied to change the confinement of the burning event. Three different materials of baffles are used to alter the radia-tive boundary conditions of the space that the flame resides: transparent polycarbonate, black anodized aluminum, and polished aluminum. In all tests, samples are ignited at the upstream leading edge and allowed to burn to completion. The results show that at low flow speeds ( 17 cm/s), the flame reaches a steady state for all tested baffle types and baffle distances. The spread rates and flame lengths at the steady state increase first and then decrease when the baffle distance decreases, resulting in an opti-mal baffle distance for flame spread. Furthermore, there exists a limiting baffle distance below which the flame fails to spread. It is concluded that the confinement imposed by the baffles accelerates the flow during the combustion thermal expansion and the baffles reflect flame radiation back to the sample sur -face, both of which intensifying the burning. However, the confinement also limits the oxygen supply and introduces conductive heat loss away from the flame. At the same baffle distance and imposed flow speed, flame length and spread rate are largest for polished aluminum baffles, and lowest for transparent polycarbonate baffles. The differences are most prominent at intermediate tested baffle distances. While the radiative heat feedback from the baffles is expected to increase when the baffle distance decreases, flame length and flame spread rate are similar for all baffle types at small baffle distances as the com-bustion is limited by the reduced oxygen supply.(c) 2020 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.