首页> 外文期刊>Collection Management >Ebooks Versus Print Books: Format Preferences in an Academic Library
【24h】

Ebooks Versus Print Books: Format Preferences in an Academic Library

机译:电子书与印刷书:高校图书馆的格式首选项

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

When a scholarly monograph is made available in both print and electronic formats, which format will users prefer? This study analyzed monograph usage data from three university presses in the University of Toronto Libraries' collections, comparing print and ebook usage patterns of identical titles. The goal was to examine format preferences and determine whether there are differences in usage across subject disciplines or publishers. The study showed that although in many cases users preferred one format over another, they used books in both formats. If a subject was popular, usage tended to be high for both formats, and if unpopular, low for both formats. The data also indicated that there were some noticeable differences in ebook usage for particular subjects, and the authors concluded that format does matter and therefore it is desirable for libraries to provide both formats if possible. The study also highlighted how critical metadata are in promoting the use of electronic resources. If there were no ebook metadata within the library catalog, the ebook usage was low. This analysis adds to a growing body of literature in user preferences on book formats that can assist libraries in making better-informed decisions in collection building.
机译:当提供印刷和电子两种形式的学术专着时,用户会喜欢哪种格式?这项研究分析了多伦多大学图书馆藏书中三所大学出版社的专着使用数据,比较了相同标题的印刷和电子书使用模式。目的是检查格式首选项,并确定主题学科或发布者在用法上是否存在差异。研究表明,尽管在许多情况下,用户更喜欢一种格式,但他们使用两种格式的书。如果某个主题很受欢迎,则两种格式的使用率往往很高,如果不受欢迎,则两种格式的使用率都很低。数据还表明,特定主题的电子书使用存在明显差异,并且作者得出结论认为格式确实很重要,因此,如果可能的话,希望图书馆提供两种格式。该研究还强调了关键元数据在促进电子资源使用方面的作用。如果图书馆目录中没有电子书元数据,则电子书使用率较低。这种分析增加了用户对书籍格式的偏好的文献,可以帮助图书馆在馆藏建设中做出更明智的决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号