首页> 外文期刊>Collection Management >Awareness and Usage of Emerald Insight Database as Determinant of Research Output for Researcher Scholar of Aligarh Muslim University, India
【24h】

Awareness and Usage of Emerald Insight Database as Determinant of Research Output for Researcher Scholar of Aligarh Muslim University, India

机译:翡翠洞察数据库的意识和用途,决定着印度阿里加尔穆斯林大学研究员的研究成果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: This paper focuses on the usage of Emerald Insight database by the university researchers of all branches. This study intends to determine the researchers' usage pattern and their level of satisfaction toward the Emerald Insight database. Methodology: A total of 260 well-structured questionnaires were randomly distributed to the researchers of distinguish faculties and out of these 187 questionnaires were received. Later, each response was examined to check whether the respondent had filled questionnaires appropriately or not. Only six questionnaires were found to be discarded due to incomplete information provided by the respondents. Finally, a total of 181 questionnaires were included in the study constituting 69.61% response rate. Afterward, these responses were coded and various statistics such as Central Tendency, Cumulative Frequency, Percentage, etc. were applied upon the data using SPSS. According to the nature of data graphs, charts, and tables were drawn using MS Excel. The usage data of Emerald Insight for last six years was also clubbed into the study which was arranged by the Maulana Azad (MA) Library on a request. Findings: Demographically, a total of 181 respondents were participated in the study of which 170 respondents were working on PhD and only 11 respondents were working on PDF (Post Doctorate Fellowship) program. All respondents were found aware of Emerald Insight database and none was found unaware; however some respondents (16.57%) were averagely aware, a very few respondents (10.49%) were scarcely aware, and remaining (72.89%) were fully aware. The availability of full text, multidisciplinary nature, and friendly interface were major reasons that compelled researchers to use Emerald Insight database. More or less, both searching techniques were used by respondents. In advance search category, phrase search (55.24%) appeared as most common method followed by author search (24.30%) and Boolean operators (12.15%). Their order of preference was as the newest one (46.96%) than relevancy (45.86%) and lastly, the oldest one (7.18%). Besides, the researchers were also found highly satisfied in all aspects of features provided by the Emerald Insight database from searching techniques to its recency and adequacy of literature. Furthermore, the majority of researchers (84.53%) were found fully satisfied, whereas only 2.20% respondents were fully dissatisfied. Their satisfaction was supported by the usage date received by the MA Library which had revealed a gradual increment in the number of items downloaded per year from 2012 to 2017. The usage just doubled from 4546 items downloaded in 2012 to 9541 items downloaded in 2017. Originality: Indeed, this study is original and guarantees that none of such study has been conducted earlier. After going through the profound literature review, no similar study is found. Hence, this study, of course, is new and original.
机译:目的:本文重点研究各分支机构的大学研究人员对Emerald Insight数据库的使用。这项研究旨在确定研究人员的使用模式及其对Emerald Insight数据库的满意度。方法:将总共260份结构良好的调查问卷随机分配给各个系的研究人员,并从187份问卷中接收了这些问卷。之后,检查每个答复以检查被访者是否正确填写了调查表。由于受访者提供的信息不完整,仅发现六份问卷被丢弃。最后,本研究共纳入181份问卷,回复率为69.61%。然后,对这些响应进行编码,并使用SPSS将各种统计数据(例如中心趋势,累积频率,百分比等)应用于数据。根据数据的性质,使用MS Excel绘制了图表和表格。毛拉纳·阿扎德(MA)图书馆根据要求安排了该研究中Emerald Insight过去六年的使用数据。调查结果:从人口统计学的角度来看,共有181名受访者参与了这项研究,其中170名受访者正在从事博士学位研究,只有11名受访者正在从事PDF(博士后奖学金)计划。发现所有受访者都知道Emerald Insight数据库,并且没有人不知道。但是,一些受访者(16.57%)的平均水平是知道的,极少数的受访者(10.49%)的水平是很少的,其余(72.89%)的受访者是完全的。全文的可用性,多学科的性质以及友好的界面是迫使研究人员使用Emerald Insight数据库的主要原因。或多或少,受访者都使用了两种搜索技术。在高级搜索类别中,短语搜索(55.24%)是最常见的方法,其次是作者搜索(24.30%)和布尔运算符(12.15%)。他们的优先顺序是最新的(46.96%),而不是相关性(45.86%),最后是年龄最大的(7.18%)。此外,研究人员还对Emerald Insight数据库提供的功能的各个方面(从搜索技术到其文献的新近性和充分性)都感到高度满意。此外,大多数研究人员(84.53%)被认为是完全满意的,而只有2.20%的受访者完全不满意。他们的满意得到了MA图书馆收到使用日期的支持,该日期显示从2012年到2017年每年下载的项目数量逐渐增加。使用率从2012年下载的4546项增加到2017年下载的9541项,翻了一番。 :确实,这项研究是原创的,并保证没有早进行任何此类研究。经过深入的文献综述后,没有发现类似的研究。因此,这项研究当然是新的和原始的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号