首页> 外文期刊>Cognition & Emotion >Processing emotional stimuli: Comparison of saccadic and manual choice-reaction times
【24h】

Processing emotional stimuli: Comparison of saccadic and manual choice-reaction times

机译:处理情绪刺激:对比和手动选择反应时间

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We compared the speed of discrimination for emotional and neutral faces in four experiments, using a forced-choice saccadic and manual reaction time task. Unmasked, brief (20 ms) bilateral presentation of schematic (Exp. 1) or naturalistic (Exp. 2) emotionaleutral face pairs, led to shorter discrimination of emotional stimuli in saccadic localisation task. When the effect of interference from emotional stimuli is ruled out by showing a pairing of the emotional or neutral face with an outline face, faster saccadic discrimination was obtained for fearful facial expression only (Exp. 3). The manual discrimination reaction time was not significantly different for emotional versus neutral stimuli. To explore the absence of a manual RT effect we manipulated the stimulus duration (20 ms vs. 500 ms: Exp. 4). Faster saccadic discrimination of emotional stimuli was observed at both durations. For manual responses, emotional bias was observed only at the longest duration (500 ms). Overall, comparison of saccadic and manual responses shows that faster discrimination of emotionaleutral stimuli can be carried out within the oculomotor system. In addition, emotional stimuli are processed preferentially to neutral face stimuli.
机译:我们在四个实验中比较了情绪面孔和中性面孔的辨别速度,分别使用强迫选择的节奏和手动反应时间任务。示意性(实验1)或自然主义(实验2)情绪/中性脸对的无遮蔽,简短(20毫秒)双边呈现,导致在眼部定位任务中对情绪刺激的辨别力更短。当通过显示情绪或中性脸与轮廓脸的配对来排除来自情绪刺激的干扰的影响时,仅对于恐惧的面部表情,才能够获得更快的眼跳辨别力(实验3)。对于情绪刺激和中性刺激,手动辨别反应时间没有显着差异。为了探索不存在手动RT效应的情况,我们操纵了刺激持续时间(20毫秒对500毫秒:实验4)。在两个期间都观察到更快的情绪刺激的眼跳辨别。对于手动反应,仅在最长持续时间(500毫秒)时才观察到情绪偏见。总体而言,对眼跳和手动反应的比较表明,可以在动眼系统中更快地区分情绪/中性刺激。另外,情感刺激比中性面部刺激优先处理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号