...
首页> 外文期刊>Coastal engineering >Simulating wave runup on an intermediate-reflective beach using a wave-resolving and a wave-averaged version of XBeach
【24h】

Simulating wave runup on an intermediate-reflective beach using a wave-resolving and a wave-averaged version of XBeach

机译:使用波浪解析和波浪平均版本的Xbeach模拟中间反射海滩上的波浪流程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The prediction of wave runup, as well as its components, time-averaged setup and the time-varying swash, is a key element of coastal storm hazard assessments, as wave runup controls the transitions between morphodynamic response types such as dune erosion and overwash, and the potential for flooding by wave overtopping. While theoretically able to simulate the dominant low-frequency swash, previous studies using the infragravitywave-resolving model XBeach (XBSB) have shown an underestimation of the observed swash variance and wave runup, which was in part related to the absence of incident-band swash motions in the model. Here, we use an incident-band wave-resolving, non-hydrostatic version of the XBeach model (XBNH) to simulate wave runup observed during the SandyDuck '97 experiment on an intermediate-reflective sandy beach. The results show that the XBNH model describes wave runup and the individual setup and swash components well. We subsequently examine differences in wave runup prediction between the XBSB and XBNH models and find that the XBNH model is a better predictor of wave runup than XBSB for this beach, which is due to better predictions of both the incident-band and infragravity-band swash. For a range of beach states from reflective to dissipative it is shown that incident-band swash is underestimated by XBSB relative to XBNH, in particular for reflective conditions. Infragravity-band swash is shown to be lower in XBSB than XBNH for most conditions, including dissipative conditions for which the mean difference is 16% of the deep water wave height. The difference in infragravity-band swash in XBNH relative to XBSB is shown to mainly be the result of processes occurring outside the swash zone, but approximately 15% of the difference is caused by explicitly resolving incident-band wave motions within the swash zone, such as swash-swash interactions, which inherently cannot be simulated by wave-averaged models.
机译:波浪运行的预测,以及其组件,时间平均设置和时变速度,是沿海风暴危险评估的关键元素,因为波浪流量控制形体动力学响应类型(如沙丘侵蚀和透露)之间的过渡,波浪泛型洪水的潜力。虽然从理论上能够模拟主导的低频旋转速度,以前使用IntravavityWave的模型Xbeach(XBSB)的研究表明,低估了观察到的扫描方差和波浪运行,这部分与缺乏入射带斜面有关模型中的动作。在这里,我们使用Xbeach模型(XBNH)的入射带波分辨,非静水压版本,以模拟在桑迪德克'97实验期间观察到的中间反光沙滩上的波浪。结果表明,XBNH模型介绍了波浪运行和单独的设置和旋转速度组件。我们随后检查XBSB和XBNH模型之间的波浪运行预测的差异,发现XBNH模型是波浪运行的更好预测因子,而不是这个海滩的XBSB,这是由于更好地预测入射带和Intravavity频带斜扫描。对于从反射耗散的一系列海滩状态,示出了XBSB相对于XBNH的入射带旋转,特别是对于反射条件。对于大多数条件,Intravavity频带旋转显示器比XbnH低于XbnH,包括平均差异为深水波高度的16%的耗散条件。相对于XBSB的XbnH中的Intravavity频带旋转差的差异主要是在斜扫描区域外部发生的过程的结果,但大约15%的差异是通过显式解析斜扫描区域内的入射带波动动,如斜扫描区域,这样作为旋转斜扫描的相互作用,它固有地无法通过波平均模型模拟。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Coastal engineering》 |2021年第1期|103788.1-103788.13|共13页
  • 作者单位

    Deltares Boussinesqweg 1 POB 177 NL-2600 MH Delft Netherlands|Delft Univ Technol Fac Civil Engn & Geosci Delft Netherlands|Royal HaskoningDHV Rotterdam Netherlands;

    Deltares Boussinesqweg 1 POB 177 NL-2600 MH Delft Netherlands;

    US Geol Survey St Petersburg Coastal & Marine Sci Ctr St Petersburg FL USA|Univ N Carolina Dept Earth & Ocean Sci Wilmington NC 28401 USA;

    Delft Univ Technol Fac Civil Engn & Geosci Delft Netherlands;

    Delft Univ Technol Fac Civil Engn & Geosci Delft Netherlands;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Swash; Runup; Infragravity waves; XBeach; Non-hydrostatic modeling;

    机译:旋转;runup;intravavity波;xbeach;非静水压建模;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号