...
首页> 外文期刊>Coastal engineering >Near-reef and nearshore tropical cyclone wave climate in the Great Barrier Reef with and without reef structure
【24h】

Near-reef and nearshore tropical cyclone wave climate in the Great Barrier Reef with and without reef structure

机译:大堡礁有无礁石结构的近礁和近岸热带气旋波气候

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Great Barrier Reef (GBR) coral coverage is in rapid decline from severe and sustained pressures from lagoon water quality, crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS), coral bleaching, tropical cyclones, pollution and diseases. The two recent GBR coral bleaching events (2016-2017) lead to Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) shifting their focus from passive management to active intervention (Great Barrier Reef Blueprint for resilience by GBRMPA). These active interventions, potentially able to increase GBR resilience, as there are reefs that, due to their physical location relative to all other reefs, river and estuary entrances, ocean currents, have favourable coral growth conditions. To undertake such interventions, various information is required including tropical cyclone wave climates. This paper develops tropical cyclone wave climates for the entire GBR. These wave climates were developed by simulating several thousand synthetic cyclones derived from the "HadGEM" general circulation model with RCP8.5 climate change scenario. The synthetic cyclones adopted herein include the following climate changes assessed by comparing averages of key forcing parameters between 1950 to 1999 and 2050 to 2099. Their average arrival rate increases from 2.25 to 2.41 cyclones/year and their average maximum wind speed increases from 24 to 28 m/s. Their average radius to maximum winds remains constant at 51 km. Two key challenges were resolved, namely, long runtimes and large files (600 m grid increment covering 1800 km by 280 km). Runtimes were reduced by excluding cyclones where their wind speeds over the entire event never exceeded 10 m/s within GBR itself or within 100 km of the GBR over water. Maximum wave heights were compared with an extended fetch empirical expression, which was based on satellite data of tropical cyclones in open waters, when cyclones were outside the GBR lagoon. These comparisons indicate that predicted wave heights have a lower bias using default wave generation parameters when compared with the extended fetch empirical expression. Prediction uncertainty was estimated at no more than 10% from various cyclonic windfield models. The existing GBR reefs reduce nearshore wave or runup height by between 1.5 and 2 times compared to the no reef case. The reduction in wave or runup height was found to be minimal for 1 m sea level rise. These two findings indicate that there is more flooding potential from coral removal than SLR within the GBR lagoon.
机译:由于泻湖水质,荆棘冠海星(COTS),珊瑚褪色,热带气旋,污染和疾病所造成的持续压力,大堡礁(GBR)珊瑚的覆盖范围正在迅速减少。 GBR最近发生的两次珊瑚褪色事件(2016-2017)导致大堡礁海洋公园管理局(GBRMPA)将重点从被动管理转移到了主动干预(GBRMPA的大堡礁恢复力蓝图)。这些积极的干预措施有可能提高GBR的复原力,因为有些礁石由于其相对于所有其他礁石的地理位置而处于有利位置,河流和河口入口,洋流具有有利的珊瑚生长条件。为了进行这样的干预,需要包括热带气旋波气候在内的各种信息。本文研究了整个GBR的热带气旋波气候。这些波浪气候是通过使用RCP8.5气候变化情景模拟从“ HadGEM”总体循环模型得出的数千个合成旋风而开发的。通过比较1950年至1999年以及2050年至2099年的主要强迫参数的平均值,评估得出以下合成气旋的气候变化。它们的平均到达速度从2.25旋风增加到2.41旋风/年,平均最大风速从24上升到28多发性硬化症。它们与最大风的平均半径保持恒定在51 km。解决了两个关键挑战,即长时间运行和大型文件(600 m网格增量,覆盖1800 km x 280 km)。通过排除旋风除尘器来减少运行时间,旋风除尘器在整个事件中其风速在GBR自身内或在水上GBR的100 km以内都不会超过10 m / s。将最大波高与扩展的获取经验表达式进行了比较,该经验表达式基于旋风在GBR泻湖之外时在开阔水域中热带旋风的卫星数据。这些比较表明,与扩展的获取经验表达式相比,使用默认波生成参数预测的波高具有较低的偏差。根据各种气旋风场模型,预测不确定性估计不超过10%。与没有礁石的情况相比,现有的GBR礁石使近岸波浪或上升高度降低了1.5到2倍。发现在海平面上升1 m时,波浪或上升高度的减小最小。这两个发现表明,在GBR泻湖内,去除珊瑚的洪灾潜力比SLR更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号