首页> 外文期刊>Clothing and Textiles Research Journal >Comparison of Garment Sizing Systems
【24h】

Comparison of Garment Sizing Systems

机译:服装上浆系统的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Reflecting two ways of impacting a garment sizing system-by modifying the body sizing table, and by modifying the ease amounts added (at bust and hip only), 4 garment sizing systems presenting the combinations of a standard (ASTM D5585-95R01) or a modified body sizing table, each with constant or size-dependent ease amounts across sizes, were compared by testing their relative (as opposed to absolute) performance in fit tests with 81 study participants. Test garments (princess style jackets), sizes 2-16, were manufactured for each system (32 garments). Each participant was photographed in the best-fitting size garment from each system. Three fit experts ranked the 4 garments by fit for each study participant Statistical analysis indicated better overall performance of systems based on size-dependent ease (but not within each size group) and of the modified table (significantly better for participants with small hip-bust drop and not significantly for participants with large drop).
机译:反映影响服装尺码系统的两种方式-修改人体尺码表,并修改增加的舒适度(仅在胸围和臀部),四个服装尺码系统采用标准(ASTM D5585-95R01)或修改后的人体尺码表,每个尺码在各个尺寸上具有恒定或与尺寸有关的缓解量,通过与81位研究参与者进行适合性测试来测试其相对(而不是绝对)性能来进行比较。为每个系统制造了大小为2-16的测试服(公主式夹克)(32件服)。每个参与者都穿着每个系统的最合适尺码的服装拍照。三名合适的专家对每位研究参与者的4种服装进行了合适的排名。统计分析表明,基于尺寸相关的舒适度(但不是每个尺寸组)的系统和改良表的整体性能更好(对于臀围小的参与者明显更好)下降,对于下降幅度较大的参与者而言,下降幅度不大)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号