...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Risk >Case in focus: Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Debra Britton v Cardiff & NHS Trust
【24h】

Case in focus: Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Debra Britton v Cardiff & NHS Trust

机译:重点案例:《欧洲人权公约》第2条。黛布拉·布里顿(Debra Britton)诉加的夫(Cardiff)和NHS信托

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The right to life, as enshrined innArticle 2 of the European Conventionnon Human Rights (ECHR) might benthought to have limited application tona death which takes place in hospital.nAfter all, the ECHR was a treatynsigned in 1950 which sought to extinguishnforever the horrors of WorldnWar II and, in particular, thenHolocaust. The ECHR was conceivednas a means by which the Statenmay be held accountable to the individualnin a way that it was hopednwould help guard against the rise ofntotalitarian states.nHowever, it has long been recognizednthat the ambit of the ECHRnextends beyond the situations thatnthose responsible for conceiving itnmay have had in the forefront of theirnminds in 1950. Prior to and since thencoming into force in this country ofnthe Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA),nwhich gave effect in the UK to thenrights set out in the ECHR, commentatorsnhave speculated about thenextent to which arguments basednupon alleged breaches of Article 2nmight arise in cases involving the provisionnof healthcare by the NHS.
机译:如《欧洲公约》非人权法第2条所规定的那样,生命权可能原本应该只适用于在医院发生的死亡案例。n毕竟,欧洲人权公约是1950年签署的一项条约,旨在永远消除世界战争的恐惧II,尤其是大屠杀。 ECHR被认为是一种手段,可以使国家对个人负责,以希望可以帮助防止国家主义国家的崛起。然而,人们早已认识到,ECHR的范围已超越了负责设想其的​​范围。在1950年,他们就一直走在他们的前列。在此之前和之后,1998年《人权法》(HRA)在英国生效,该法令在英国生效了ECHR中规定的当时的权利,评论家们一直在猜测当时争论的范围涉及NHS提供医疗保健的案件中,可能会发生基于Nupon的据称违反第2条的情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号