...
首页> 外文期刊>Climate change economics >EXPLORING THE IMPACTS OF A NATIONAL U.S. C02 TAX AND REVENUE RECYCLING OPTIONS WITH A COUPLED ELECTRICITY-ECONOMY MODEL
【24h】

EXPLORING THE IMPACTS OF A NATIONAL U.S. C02 TAX AND REVENUE RECYCLING OPTIONS WITH A COUPLED ELECTRICITY-ECONOMY MODEL

机译:用耦合电-经济模型探讨美国国家CO2税和税收回收选项的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper provides a comprehensive exploration of the impacts of economy-wide CO_2 taxes in the U.S. simulated using a detailed electric sector model [the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's Regional Energy Deployment System (ReEDS)] linked with a computable general equilibrium model of the U.S. economy [the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's U.S. Regional Energy Policy (USREP) model]. We implement various tax trajectories and options for using the revenue collected by the tax and describe their impact on household welfare and its distribution across income levels. Overall, we find that our top-down/bottom-up models affects estimates of the distribution and cost of emission reductions as well as the amount of revenue collected, but that these are mostly insensitive to the way the revenue is recycled. We find that substantial abatement opportunities through fuel switching and renewable penetration in the electricity sector allow the economy to accommodate extensive emissions reductions at relatively low cost. While welfare impacts are largely determined by the choice of revenue recycling scheme, all tax levels and schemes provide net benefits when accounting for the avoided global climate change benefits of emission reductions. Recycling revenue through capital income tax rebates is more efficient than labor income tax rebates or uniform transfers to households. While capital tax rebates substantially reduce the overall costs of emission abatement, they profit high income households the most and are regressive. We more generally identify a clear trade-off between equity and efficiency across the various recycling options. However, we show through a set of hybrid recycling schemes that it is possible to limit inequalities in impacts, particularly those on the lowest income households, at relatively little incremental cost.
机译:本文使用详细的电力部门模型[国家可再生能源实验室的区域能源部署系统(ReEDS)]与可计算的美国经济总体均衡模型相结合,对美国范围内的整个经济所产生的CO_2税的影响进行了全面探索。 [麻省理工学院的美国区域能源政策(USREP)模型]。我们使用税收收集的收入实现各种税收轨迹和选择,并描述它们对家庭福利及其在各个收入水平上的分布的影响。总体而言,我们发现我们的自上而下/自下而上的模型会影响减排量的分配,成本估算以及所收集的收入总额,但是这些对收入的回收方式几乎不敏感。我们发现,通过燃料转换和可再生能源在电力部门的大量减排机会,可以使经济以相对较低的成本实现广泛的减排。虽然福利影响在很大程度上取决于收入回收计划的选择,但是在考虑避免的全球减排所带来的全球气候变化收益时,所有税收级别和计划都将提供净收益。通过资本所得税返还来回收收入比劳动所得税返还或向家庭的统一转移更有效率。尽管资本退税可以大大减少减排的总成本,但它们可以使高收入家庭受益最多,并且具有累退性。我们通常会在各种回收方案中找到公平与效率之间的明显权衡。但是,我们通过一系列混合回收计划表明,可以用相对较少的增量成本来限制影响中的不平等现象,特别是那些对低收入家庭的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号