首页> 外文期刊>CIWM >RDF Intervention
【24h】

RDF Intervention

机译:RDF干预

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We welcomed Defra's call for evidence about RDF in March this year and submitted our insight as an RDF producer and operator of three EfW facilities (with two additional plants under construction). From our experience, the Environment Agency should increase the monitoring and policing of the RDF market using existing powers and the permitting system to clamp down on illegal activity which discredits the sector. However, too much governmental intervention could damage the viability of the market. There is a shortage of EfW treatment capacity in the UK, whilst there is overcapacity in Europe due to decreasing tonnages of residual waste. Low shipping costs and the current strength of sterling make exporting RDF less expensive and more environmentally suitable than landfill disposal. More EfW capacity is currently under construction or planned in the UK and these facilities, once they become operational towards the end of the decade, will compete against exporting opportunities for RDF.
机译:我们欢迎Defra在今年3月呼吁提供有关RDF的证据,并作为三个EfW设施(另外两个正在建设中的工厂)的RDF生产商和运营商提出了我们的见解。根据我们的经验,环境局应利用现有权力和许可制度,加强对RDF市场的监督和监管,以制止歧视该行业的非法活动。但是,过多的政府干预可能会损害市场的生存能力。英国的EfW处理能力不足,而欧洲由于剩余废物吨位的减少而产能过剩。低廉的运输成本和当前的英镑优势使出口RDF的成本比垃圾掩埋更便宜,更适合环境。英国目前正在建设或计划增加EfW能力,这些设施一旦在本世纪末开始投入运营,将与RDF的出口机会竞争。

著录项

  • 来源
    《CIWM》 |2015年第1期|33-33|共1页
  • 作者

    Kristian Dales;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号