首页> 外文期刊>Civil wars >Theory, Method, and the Mechanism of Framing: Reflections on the Syrian Civil War and Palestinian Intifada
【24h】

Theory, Method, and the Mechanism of Framing: Reflections on the Syrian Civil War and Palestinian Intifada

机译:理论,方法和框架机制:对叙利亚内战和巴勒斯坦起义的思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This article bridges two literatures: research on social movements, in which framing is widely recognized as an important causal mechanism; and research in civil wars and insurgencies, which tends to deemphasize cultural-interpretative factors such as framing. We argue that it is important that insights of framing be applied to insurgencies because there is a fundamental framing action that often occurs. We have in mind civil wars in which oppositional activists, who previously had pursued nonviolent tactics, apply a prognostic frame of 'what to do' that specifies armed conflict. Drawing on methodologies of subject-verb-object grammars used to analyze political texts, this article elaborates a comprehensive approach to framing that involves not only shifts in the , or specifications of 'what to do', but also shifts in a < subject > , or definitions of 'who we are', and in an , or the targets of 'who the enemy is'. We use organizational texts from the first Palestinian Intifada to demonstrate the approach. We also consider frame shifts in the Syrian civil war, inferring the grammatical structures of the frame transformations for secularists and radical Islamists from events leading up to the outbreak of sustained violence. This article proposes that a three-part grammatical approach captures the interrelated elements of a full and robust framing mechanism that is generalizable. It represents an advance over framing perspectives that typically isolate identity and target components from action prognoses, therefore missing the synchronization among the three, and how limits and/or opportunities for one shape the definition of the others.
机译:本文架起了两篇文献的桥梁:关于社会运动的研究,其中框架被广泛认为是重要的因果机制;以及对内战和叛乱的研究,这些研究往往不强调框架等文化解释因素。我们认为将框架的见解应用于暴行很重要,因为经常会发生基本的框架行为。我们想到了内战,在那场战争中,先前奉行非暴力战术的反对派活动家采用了预言框架“做什么”,该框架规定了武装冲突。借助用于分析政治文本的主语-宾语-宾语语法的方法论,本文阐述了一种综合的构架方法,不仅涉及<动词>或“做什么”的说明,而且涉及< subject>或“我们是谁”的定义,以及或“敌人是谁”的目标。我们使用第一批巴勒斯坦起义的组织文本来证明这种方法。我们还考虑了叙利亚内战中的框架转变,从导致持续暴力爆发的事件中推断出世俗主义者和激进伊斯兰主义者的框架转变的语法结构。本文提出了一个由三部分组成的语法方法,它捕获了可概括的完整而强大的框架机制的相互关联的元素。它代表了框架视角的进步,框架视角通常将身份和目标组成部分与行动预测隔离开来,因此缺少三者之间的同步性,以及一者的局限和/或机会如何塑造了另一者的定义。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Civil wars》 |2015年第2期|266-289|共24页
  • 作者

    HANK JOHNSTON;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Sociology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, 92182-4423, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号