首页> 外文期刊>Civil Engineering >What's In A Name? Perhaps A Large Judgment
【24h】

What's In A Name? Perhaps A Large Judgment

机译:名字叫什么?也许是一个大判断

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Many plaintiffs face a two-pronged hurdle in pursuing their legal remedies. Not only must a party obtain a valid judgment from a court or arbitrator; it must also evaluate the "collectibility" of that judgment. One prerequisite for collecting on a judgment is that the plaintiff must have sued the correct legal entity at the outset. Although it sounds like a simple proposition, a party signing a contract may not be the party actually performing the work. Likewise, the party performing the work may not be the party executing the change orders. Rockin Restaurants, Inc., v. Bolton Construction Co., Inc., underscores the difficulties one project owner recently experienced in keeping track of the precise legal entity it was doing business with and in suing the appropriate party.
机译:许多原告在寻求法律补救时面临两方面的障碍。当事人不仅必须从法院或仲裁员那里获得有效的判决;它还必须评估该判断的“可收集性”。进行判决的先决条件是原告必须在一开始就起诉正确的法人实体。尽管听起来很简单,但签订合同的一方可能不是实际执行工作的一方。同样,执行工作的一方可能不是执行变更单的一方。 Rockin Restaurants,Inc.诉Bolton Construction Co.,Inc.强调了一个项目所有者最近在跟踪与之开展业务的确切法人实体以及起诉适当方方面遇到的困难。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号