首页> 外文期刊>Civil Engineering >The NEC3 Dispute Resolution Clause Option W1 and the appointment of the adjudicator
【24h】

The NEC3 Dispute Resolution Clause Option W1 and the appointment of the adjudicator

机译:NEC3争议解决条款第W1条和裁决人的任命

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It appears that in South Africa, whichever form of contract applies, the preference is for ad hoc rather than standing adjudication panels. Dispute resolution is dealt with in Option W1 of the NEC3. This Option envisages having a standing adjudicator appointed to the project, by way of the contract data. In a recent article, where we discussed developments in South Africa, however, we concluded that Option Wl is, at least locally, generally used as an ad hoc adjudication process. This had been reinforced by the findings of the court in Transnet SOC Limited v Group Five Construction (Pty) Ltd and others.
机译:似乎在南非,无论采用哪种合同形式,都更倾向于临时而不是常设裁决小组。 NEC3的选项W1处理争议解决。该方案设想通过合同数据为项目指定一名常设裁判员。但是,在最近的一篇文章中,我们讨论了南非的事态发展,得出的结论是,至少在本地,选项W1通常被用作临时裁决程序。法院在Transnet SOC Limited诉Group 5 Construction(Pty)Ltd等案中的裁定进一步证明了这一点。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Civil Engineering》 |2017年第4期|46-47|共2页
  • 作者

    Ian Massey;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号