首页> 外文期刊>Civil Engineering Surveyor >The risk of having your cake and eating it: Take care when drafting PCSAs
【24h】

The risk of having your cake and eating it: Take care when drafting PCSAs

机译:吃蛋糕的风险:起草PCSA时要小心

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

FOR several years now, two stage tendering - and with it the use of pre-construction services agreements (PCSA) - has been the normal procurement route for major building projects, at least in the London commercial market. The June 2016 referendum vote was widely expected to mark a watershed and to herald a shift back towards a single stage approach, but in our experience that simply has not happened.Main contractors continue to be risk averse and will routinely decline to bid on a single stage basis, other than for most favoured clients. Carillion's recent collapse has only brought the problem into sharper focus and has highlighted the dangers of bidding for work without a full appreciation of the risks involved. Although widely used, there has until now been little judicial consideration of PCSAs and how they operate in practice. Jefford J's recent decision in Almacantar (Centre Point) Ltd v Sir Robert McAlpine Ltd is both welcome and of particular interest.
机译:多年来,至少在伦敦商业市场中,两阶段招标(以及使用施工前服务协议(PCSA))一直是大型建筑项目的常规采购途径。人们普遍预计2016年6月的全民投票将是一个分水岭,并预示着将重回单一阶段的做法,但根据我们的经验,这根本没有发生。 r n主要承包商仍会规避风险,并会常规拒绝竞标除最受青睐的客户外,均以单一阶段为基础。 Carillion最近的崩溃只是使问题更加突出,并且突显了在未完全意识到所涉风险的情况下竞标工作的危险。尽管被广泛使用,但迄今为止,对PCSA及其运作方式的司法审查很少。 Jefford J在Almacantar(Centre Point)Ltd诉Robert McAlpine Ltd爵士案中的最新决定既令人欢迎,也引起了特别关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号