...
首页> 外文期刊>Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems >Systems thinking, culture of reliability and safety
【24h】

Systems thinking, culture of reliability and safety

机译:系统思考,可靠性和安全性文化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The paper reflects upon the intellectual contribution of both David Blockley and the late Barry Turner to contemporary thinking about organisational accidents and safety cultures in hazardous systems. When they first worked together in the 1980s, events such as the Chernobyl and Challenger accidents highlighted the fact that in seeking the causes of many modern large-scale accidents we must now consider the interaction between technology and organisational failings. Theoretical models also moved on at that time from descriptions of accidents and their causes, in an attempt to specify 'safe' cultures and 'high-reliability' organisations. Recent research has shown us that while effective learning about hazards is a common assumption of such attempts, organisations can still be very resistant to learn the full lessons from past incidents and mistakes. This paper discusses the ways of addressing barriers to learning in high-risk socio-technical systems.
机译:该论文反映了大卫·布洛克利(David Blockley)和已故的巴里·特纳(Barry Turner)对当代有关危险系统中的组织事故和安全文化的思考的智力贡献。当他们在1980年代首次合作时,切尔诺贝利事故和挑战者事故等事件突显了这样一个事实,即在寻找许多现代大规模事故原因时,我们现在必须考虑技术与组织失败之间的相互作用。当时,理论模型也从事故及其原因的描述出发,试图确定“安全”文化和“高可靠性”组织。最近的研究表明,尽管有效地了解危害是进行此类尝试的普遍假设,但组织仍然非常难以从过去的事件和错误中吸取教训。本文讨论了解决高风险社会技术系统中学习障碍的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号