首页> 外文期刊>City >Actually existing smart citizens Expertise and (non)participation in the making of the smart city
【24h】

Actually existing smart citizens Expertise and (non)participation in the making of the smart city

机译:实际存在的智慧公民专长和(不)参与智慧城市的建设

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In response to the mounting criticism of emerging 'smart cities' strategies around the world, a number of individuals and institutions have attempted to pivot from discussions of smart cities towards a focus on 'smart citizens'. While the smart citizen is most often seen as a kind of foil for those more stereotypically top-down, neoliberal and repressive visions of the smart city that have been widely critiqued within the literature, this paper argues for an attention to the 'actually existing smart citizen', who plays a much messier and more ambivalent role in practice. This paper proposes the dual figures of 'the general citizen' and 'the absent citizen' as a heuristic for thinking about how the lines of inclusion and exclusion are drawn for citizens, both discursively and materially, in the actual making of the smart city. These figures are meant to highlight how the universal and unspecified figure of 'the citizen' is discursively deployed to justify smart city policies, while at the same time, actual citizens remain largely excluded from such decision and policy-making processes. Using a case study of Atlanta, Georgia and its ongoing smart cities initiatives, we argue that while the participation of citizens is crucial to any truly democratic mode of urban governance, the emerging discourse around the promise of smart citizenship fails to capture the realities of how citizens are actually discussed and enrolled in the making of these policies.
机译:为了回应全球对新兴的“智慧城市”战略的批评,许多个人和机构试图从对智慧城市的讨论转向关注“智慧公民”。虽然智慧公民最常被视为是对智慧城市的定型,自上而下,新自由主义和压迫性愿景的挫败,但在文献中已广受批评,但本文主张关注“实际存在的智慧城市”。公民”,在实践中起着更加混乱和矛盾的作用。本文提出了“普通公民”和“缺席公民”的双重数字,作为一种启发式方法,用于思考如何在智慧城市的实际制造过程中以话语和物质方式为公民划定包含和排除的界限。这些数字旨在突显出如何分散地使用“公民”这一普遍且未指定的数字来证明智能城市政策的合理性,同时,实际公民在很大程度上仍未参与此类决策和决策过程。通过对佐治亚州亚特兰大市及其正在进行的智慧城市计划的案例研究,我们认为,尽管公民的参与对于任何真正民主的城市治理模式都是至关重要的,但围绕智慧公民身份的承诺的新兴论述未能抓住现实的现实。公民实际上是在讨论和参与制定这些政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号