首页> 外文期刊>Cities >Does collaborative tree planting between nonprofits and neighborhood groups improve neighborhood community capacity?
【24h】

Does collaborative tree planting between nonprofits and neighborhood groups improve neighborhood community capacity?

机译:非营利组织和社区组织之间的合作植树会提高社区社区的能力吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the past decade, urban tree canopy cover goals and tree-planting initiatives have proliferated among local governments and nonprofit organizations across the globe. While research has documented many benefits new trees will provide, less has considered whether active participation of city residents in urban forestry activities might also benefit urban neighborhoods. This paper examines nonprofit tree-planting programs in four cities in the Midwestern and Eastern United States to determine whether and to what extent neighborhood participation in a nonprofit tree-planting project might increase ties between residents, social cohesion, and shared trust in that neighborhood. We leveraged a unique dataset of ecological and social information about tree-planting neighborhoods and matched comparison (non-tree planting) neighborhoods (total neighborhoods = 197; total survey respondents = 1551). The evidence for a social effect of nonprofit tree-planting programs is mixed. When asked directly, neighborhood residents reported observing positive changes. Linear regression analysis reveals significantly higher neighborhood ties reported by individuals in planting neighborhoods. However, we fmd no significant relationship between tree planting and social cohesion or trust. In single-city models, planting's association with neighborhood ties and social cohesion is only significant in one city, and associations with trust are not significant in any city. Models that aggregate responses at the neighborhood level find no significant association of tree planting. Findings suggest that tree planting may increase neighborhood ties, but that increases in social cohesion and/or trust are not guaranteed.
机译:在过去的十年中,全球各地的地方政府和非营利组织在城市树冠的覆盖范围和植树计划方面均取得了积极的进展。尽管研究证明了新树木将带来许多好处,但很少有人考虑城市居民积极参与城市林业活动是否也会使城市社区受益。本文研究了美国中西部和东部四个城市的非营利性植树计划,以确定社区参与非营利性植树项目是否以及在何种程度上可以增强居民之间的联系,社会凝聚力和对该社区的共同信任。我们利用了有关植树社区和比较(非植树)社区的独特的生态和社会信息数据集(总社区= 197;总受访者= 1551)。非营利性植树计划产生社会影响的证据好坏参半。当直接问到时,邻里居民报告说观察到了积极的变化。线性回归分析显示,种植邻里的个体报告的邻里联系明显更高。但是,我们发现植树与社会凝聚力或信任之间没有显着关系。在单城市模型中,种植与邻里关系和社会凝聚力的联系仅在一个城市中很重要,而与信任的联系在任何一个城市中都不重要。在社区一级汇总响应的模型没有发现植树的显着关联。研究结果表明,植树可以增加邻里关系,但不能保证社会凝聚力和/或信任度的提高。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Cities》 |2018年第4期|83-99|共17页
  • 作者单位

    Indiana Univ, Sch Publ & Environm Affairs, 1315 E 10th St, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA;

    Indiana Univ, Sch Publ & Environm Affairs, 1315 E 10th St, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA;

    Indiana Univ, Sch Publ & Environm Affairs, 1315 E 10th St, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA;

    Indiana Univ, Sch Publ & Environm Affairs, 1315 E 10th St, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA;

    Indiana Univ, Sch Publ & Environm Affairs, 1315 E 10th St, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA;

    Indiana Univ, Sch Publ & Environm Affairs, 1315 E 10th St, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA;

    US Forest Serv, Northern Res Stn, 1033 Univ Pl,Suite 360, Evanston, IL 60201 USA;

    Indiana Univ, Dept Geog, 701 E Kirkwood Ave, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Street trees; Urban stewardship; Atlanta, GA; Detroit, MI; Indianapolis, IN; Philadelphia, PA;

    机译:街道树木;城市管理;乔治亚州亚特兰大;密歇根州底特律;印第安纳州印第安纳波利斯;宾夕法尼亚州费城;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号