...
首页> 外文期刊>Cities >Bypassing institutional barriers: New types of transit-oriented development in China
【24h】

Bypassing institutional barriers: New types of transit-oriented development in China

机译:绕过制度障碍:中国的新型过境途径发展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

China is often viewed as an emerging experimental base for transit-oriented development (TOD) practices because of its rapid urban growth and development of mass transit networks. The implementation of TOD can be heavily influenced by institutional barriers to urban growth. However, some newly emerging types of TOD practice allow planners and decision-makers to bypass some of the institutional barriers and achieve a certain degree of integrated development. Current academic literature, however, has little to say on how these informal institutional solutions go around these barriers. This article aims to fill this gap by examining three different types of TOD practice as applied in Guangzhou and Shenzhen. We analysed and compared the origins and effects of abovementioned informal institutional arrangements under entrepreneurial governance. We found that land value capturing can replace the existing governance mode in which local government heavily relies on revenue from land-leasing and realise better integration of transit and land development. We conclude with several suggestions for institutional reform based on these new types of TOD experiments.
机译:由于其迅速的城市增长和大规模运输网络的发展,中国经常被视为过境发展(TOD)实践的新兴实验基础。迄今为止的实施可能受到城市增长的机构障碍的影响。然而,一些新兴类型的TOD实践允许规划者和决策者绕过一些机构障碍并实现一定程度的综合发展。然而,目前的学术文献几乎没有说这些非正式的机构解决方案如何解决这些障碍。本文旨在通过审查在广州和深圳应用的三种不同类型的TOD实践来填补这一差距。我们分析并比较了在企业家治理下上述非正式制度安排的起源和影响。我们发现土地价值捕获可以取代现有的治理模式,其中当地政府严重依赖于土地租赁的收入,实现过境和土地发展的更好地整合。我们结束了基于这些新型TOD实验的制度改革建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号