首页> 外文期刊>Chromatographia >Comments on the Baseline Removal Method Based on Quantile Regression and Comparison of Several Methods
【24h】

Comments on the Baseline Removal Method Based on Quantile Regression and Comparison of Several Methods

机译:基于分位数回归的基线去除方法的评论以及几种方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Several months ago, a paper by Komsta describing a method of baseline removal based on quantile regression for chromatographic datasets was published in this journal entitled “Comparison of Several Methods of Chromatographic Baseline Removal with a New Approach Based on Quantile Regression”. By comparing baseline removal methods based on polynomial, spline, loess and Whittaker smoother with the newly introduced method, Komsta concluded that the main advantage of this baseline removal method is visible better performance and short computational time. Unfortunately several wrong conclusions about the baseline removal methods based on Whittaker smoother contained in this paper. We feel that wrong conclusions about the baseline removal methods based on Whittaker smoother needs to be corrected so that it will not mislead the reader.
机译:几个月前,Komsta发表了一篇论文,该论文描述了基于分位数回归的色谱数据集的基线去除方法,该论文的标题为“使用基于分位数回归的新方法比较色谱基线的几种方法”。通过将基于多项式,样条曲线,黄土和Whittaker平滑器的基线去除方法与新引入的方法进行比较,Komsta得出结论,该基线去除方法的主要优点是可见的更好的性能和较短的计算时间。不幸的是,本文中包含有关基于Whittaker平滑器的基线删除方法的一些错误结论。我们认为有关基于Whittaker平滑器的基线删除方法的错误结论需要纠正,以免误导读者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号