首页> 外文期刊>Chest >Can We Predict Daily Adherence to Warfarin?: Results From the International Normalized Ratio Adherence and Genetics (IN-RANGE) Study
【24h】

Can We Predict Daily Adherence to Warfarin?: Results From the International Normalized Ratio Adherence and Genetics (IN-RANGE) Study

机译:我们可以预测对华法林的每日依从性吗?:国际归一化比率依从性和遗传学(IN-RANGE)研究的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Warfarin is the primary therapy to prevent stroke and venous thromboembolism. Significant periods of nonadherence frequently go unreported by patients and undetected by providers. Currently, no comprehensive screening tool exists to help providers assess the risk of nonadherence at the time of initiation of warfarin therapy. nnMethods: This article reports on a prospective cohort study of adults initiating warfarin therapy at two anticoagulation clinics (university- and Veterans Affairs-affiliated). Nonadherence, defined by failure to record a correct daily pill bottle opening, was measured daily by electronic pill cap monitoring. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to develop a point system to predict daily nonadherence to warfarin. nnResults: We followed 114 subjects for a median of 141 days. Median nonadherence of the participants was 14.4% (interquartile range [IQR], 5.8-33.8). A point system, based on nine demographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors, distinguished those demonstrating low vs high levels of nonadherence: four points or fewer, median nonadherence 5.8% (IQR, 2.3-14.1); five points, 9.1% (IQR, 5.9-28.6); six points, 14.5% (IQR, 7.1-24.1); seven points, 14.7% (IQR, 7.0-34.7); and eight points or more, 29.3% (IQR, 15.5-41.9). The model produces a c-statistic of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.61-0.71), suggesting modest discriminating ability to predict day-level warfarin nonadherence. nnConclusions: Poor adherence to warfarin is common. A screening tool based on nine demographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors, if further validated in other patient populations, may help to identify groups of patients at lower risk for nonadherence so that intensified efforts at increased monitoring and intervention can be focused on higher-risk patients.
机译:背景:华法林是预防中风和静脉血栓栓塞的主要疗法。严重的不依从期常常不会被患者报告,也不会被提供者发现。当前,尚无全面的筛查工具可帮助提供者在开始华法林治疗时评估不依从的风险。 nn方法:本文报道了在两个抗凝诊所(与大学和退伍军人事务有关的诊所)开始使用华法林治疗的成年人的前瞻性队列研究。每天通过电子药丸盖监测来测量不依从性,即不记录正确的每日药瓶开度。使用多变量logistic回归模型开发积分系统,以预测每日对华法林的不依从性。结果:我们追踪了114名受试者,中位时间为141天。参与者的中位数不依从率为14.4%(四分位间距[IQR],5.8-33.8)。一个基于9个人口统计学,临床和社会心理因素的评分系统,将那些显示出低与高不坚持程度的人区分开:4分或更少,中位数不遵守率为5.8%(IQR,2.3-14.1); 5分,9.1%(IQR,5.9-28.6);六分,14.5%(IQR,7.1-24.1);七分,14.7%(IQR,7.0-34.7); 8分或更高,29.3%(IQR,15.5-41.9)。该模型产生的c统计量为0.66(95%CI,0.61-0.71),表明预测日水平华法林不依从性的适度区分能力。结论:对华法林依从性差是很常见的。如果在其他患者人群中进一步验证了基于九种人口统计学,临床和社会心理因素的筛查工具,则可能有助于识别出出现不依从风险较低的患者群体,因此,加大监控力度和干预措施的力度可以集中在高风险人群上耐心。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Chest》 |2010年第4期|p.883-889|共7页
  • 作者单位

    From the Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (Dr Platt) and (Drs Gross and Metlay), Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, the Reading Hospital and Medical Center (Dr Platt), Reading, PA, the Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (Drs Localio, Christie, Gross, Metlay, Cohen, Strom, and Kimmel, Mss Brensinger and Price, and Mr Newcomb) and Department of Medicine (Drs Christie, Gross, Metlay, and Strom), University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, the Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics (Drs Localio, Gross, Metlay, and Strom), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, the Department of Psychology (Dr Cruess), University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, the Department of Internal Medicine (Dr Parker), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, and the Department of Pharmacy Service (Mr Laskin), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA,;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号