首页> 外文期刊>Chemosphere >System-level responses of lake ecosystems to chemical stresses using exergy and structural exergy as ecological indicators
【24h】

System-level responses of lake ecosystems to chemical stresses using exergy and structural exergy as ecological indicators

机译:用能值和结构能值作为生态指标的湖泊生态系统对化学胁迫的系统级响应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper presents the system-level responses of experimental lake ecosystems to three chemical stresses (acidification, copper and pesticide contamination) using exergy and structural exergy as ecological indicators. The results indicate that the doses or toxicity of the three chemical stressors contributed to changes in both exergy and structural exergy. Remarkable changes in exergy and structural exergy occurred under acidic conditions and in the presence of Dursban, 24D-DMA, permethrin, bifenlhrin, Carbaryl, TCP, PCP, trichlorethylene, benzene, and high doses of Cu, oil, and hexazinone. This seemed to indicate that the subject ecosystems were seriously contaminated by these chemical stressors. For low doses of Cu, oil, atrazine, HCBP, and hexazinone, exergy and structural exergy were either unchanged or only slightly changed, suggesting that the lake ecosystems were not significantly impacted by these chemical stressors. Discussion of the relationships between ecosystem-level changes and structural and functional changes in stressed lake ecosystems indicates that the above-mentioned ecosystem-level changes were in accordance with the changes in structure and function. The observed changes in exergy and structural exergy were also consistent with Odum's predictions of shortened food chains, reduced resource use efficiency, poor stability, low information, and high entropy in stressed aquatic ecosystems. The findings lead the authors to conclude that it is feasible for exergy and structural exergy to serve as ecological indicators when characterizing the system-level responses of experimental lake ecosystems to chemical stress. These results for experimental lake ecosystems would be extrapolated to actual lakes.
机译:本文利用能值和结构能值作为生态指标,介绍了湖泊生态系统对三种化学胁迫(酸化,铜和农药污染)的系统级响应。结果表明,三种化学应激源的剂量或毒性均导致了本能和结构本能的变化。在酸性条件下,在Dursban,24D-DMA,苄氯菊酯,联苯菊酯,甲萘威,TCP,PCP,三氯乙烯,苯和高剂量的铜,油和六嗪酮的存在下,本能和结构本能的显着变化。这似乎表明主题生态系统受到了这些化学应激源的严重污染。对于低剂量的铜,油,at去津,六氯苯酚和六嗪酮,本能值和结构本能值不变或仅略有变化,这表明这些化学胁迫对湖泊生态系统的影响不大。对受胁迫的湖泊生态系统中生态系统水平变化与结构和功能变化之间关系的讨论表明,上述生态系统水平变化与结构和功能的变化一致。 Odum观察到的火用和结构用火用变化也与Odum的预测一致,即在紧张的水生生态系统中食物链缩短,资源利用效率降低,稳定性差,信息不足以及熵变高。这些发现使作者得出结论,在表征实验湖泊生态系统对化学胁迫的系统级响应时,将能干和结构能干用作生态指标是可行的。实验性湖泊生态系统的这些结果将被推算到实际的湖泊中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号