首页> 外文期刊>Chemosphere >Removal of a broad range of surfactants from municipal wastewater - Comparison between membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge treatment
【24h】

Removal of a broad range of surfactants from municipal wastewater - Comparison between membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge treatment

机译:从市政废水中去除多种表面活性剂-膜生物反应器与常规活性污泥处理之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Elimination of alkylphenol ethoxylates (APEO) and their degradation products (alkylphenols and alkylphenoxy carboxylates), as well as linear alkylbenzene sulfonates (LAS) and coconut diethanol amides (CDEA), was studied in a pilot plant membrane bioreactor (MBR) working in parallel to a full-scale wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) using conventional activated sludge (CAS). In the CAS system 87% of parent long ethoxy chain NPEOs were eliminated, but their decomposition yielded persistent acidic and neutral metabolites which were poorly removed. The elimination of short ethoxy chain NPEOs (NP_1EO and NP_2EO) averaged 50%, whereas nonylphenoxy carboxylates (NPECs) showed an increase in concentrations with respect to the ones measured in influent samples. Nonyl-phenol (NP) was the only nonylphenolic compound efficiently removed (96%) in the CAS treatment.rnOn the other hand, MBR showed good performance in removing nonylphenolic compounds with an overall elimination of 94% for the total pool of NPEO derived compounds (in comparison of 54%-overall elimination in the CAS). The elimination of individual compounds in the MBR was as follows: 97% for parent, long ethoxy chain NPEOs, 90% for short ethoxy chain NPEOs, 73% for NPECs, and 96% for NP. Consequently, the residual concentrations were in the low μg/1 level or below it.rnLAS and CDEA showed similar elimination in the both wastewater treatment systems that were investigated, and no significant differences were observed between the two treatment processes. Nevertheless, for all studied compounds the MBR effluent concentrations were consistently lower and independent of the influent concentrations. Additionally, MBR effluent quality in terms of chemical oxygen demand (COD), NH_4~+ concentration and total suspended solids (TSS) was always superior to the ones of the CAS and also independent of the influent quality, which demonstrates high potential of MBRs in the treatment of municipal wastewaters.
机译:在中试植物膜生物反应器(MBR)中研究了消除烷基酚乙氧基化物(APEO)及其降解产物(烷基酚和烷基苯氧基羧酸盐)以及线性烷基苯磺酸盐(LAS)和椰子二乙醇酰胺(CDEA)的方法。一个使用常规活性污泥(CAS)的大型废水处理厂(WWTP)。在CAS系统中,消除了87%的母体长乙氧基链NPEO,但是它们的分解产生了持久的酸性和中性代谢物,很难去除。短乙氧基链NPEO(NP_1EO和NP_2EO)的消除平均为50%,而壬基苯氧基羧酸盐(NPEC)的浓度相对于进水样品中的浓度有所增加。壬基酚(NP)是CAS处理中唯一被有效去除的壬基酚化合物(96%)。rn另一方面,MBR在去除壬基酚化合物方面表现出良好的性能,整个NPEO衍生化合物的总消除量为94% (相比之下,CAS淘汰率为54%)。 MBR中单个化合物的消除如下:母体长乙氧基链NPEO为97%,短乙氧基链NPEO为90%,NPEC为73%,NP为96%。因此,残留浓度处于低μg/ 1浓度水平或低于μg/ 1浓度。rnLAS和CDEA在所研究的两个废水处理系统中均表现出相似的消除效果,并且两个处理过程之间未观察到显着差异。然而,对于所有研究的化合物,MBR出水浓度始终较低,并且与进水浓度无关。此外,从化学需氧量(COD),NH_4〜+浓度和总悬浮固体(TSS)方面来看,MBR的出水质量始终优于CAS,而且与进水质量无关,这表明MBR的高潜力处理城市废水。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号