...
首页> 外文期刊>Chemosphere >Prediction of Henry's Law Constants via group-specific quantitative structure property relationships
【24h】

Prediction of Henry's Law Constants via group-specific quantitative structure property relationships

机译:通过特定群体的定量结构性质关系预测亨利定律常数

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Henry's Law Constants (HLCs) for several hundred organic compounds in water at 25 degrees C were predicted by Quantitative Structure Property Relationship (QSPR) models, with the division of organic compounds into specific classes to yield more accurate models than generalised ones. Both multiple linear regression (MLR) and artificial neural network (ANN) versions of models were produced for three general cases, encompassing the entire data set; one used the six best descriptors, as determined by maximising the correlation coefficient; another used the twelve best descriptors in a similar manner, whilst the third used the same twelve descriptors as English and Carroll (2001). These achieved, respectively, root-mean square errors (RMSEs) of 0.719, 0.52 and 0.607 log(H-cc) units for the MLR version and 0.601, 0.394 and 0.431 for the test set of the ANN models, where H-cc, is the ratio of the compound's concentration in the vapour phase to that in the liquid phase. These were compared with models for six specific chemical classes: (i) alkanes, (ii) cyclic alkanes, (iii) alkenes, (iv) halogenated compounds, (v) aldehydes, ketones and esters grouped together, and (vi) monoaromatics. These group-specific models had RMSEs of 0.153, 0.141. 0.097, 0.168, 0.122 and 0.104 respectively for the MLR versions and 0.684, 0.719, 0.856, 0.784, 0.875 and 0.861 for the test set of the ANN models. It was found that the class-specific models achieved lower RMSEs than the general models, when using MLR models. The use of ANN was found to improve the predictive accuracy of the general models but failed to improve that for the class-specific models vis-a-vis MLR. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:通过定量结构性质关系(QSPR)模型预测了25°C下水中数百种有机化合物的亨利定律(HLC),将有机化合物划分为特定类别以产生比广义模型更准确的模型。模型的多重线性回归(MLR)和人工神经网络(ANN)版本都是针对三种一般情况生成的,涵盖了整个数据集。一个使用了六个最佳描述符,这是通过最大化相关系数来确定的;另一个以相似的方式使用了十二个最佳描述符,而第三个使用了与English and Carroll(2001)相同的十二个描述符。这些对于MLR版本分别达到0.719、0.52和0.607 log(H-cc)单位的均方根误差(RMSE),对于ANN模型的测试集分别达到0.601、0.394和0.431,其中H-cc,是化合物在气相中的浓度与液相中的浓度之比。将这些与六个特定化学类别的模型进行了比较:(i)烷烃,(ii)环烷烃,(iii)烯烃,(iv)卤代化合物,(v)醛,酮和酯归为一组,以及(vi)单芳烃。这些特定于组的模型的RMSE为0.153、0.141。对于MLR版本,分别为0.097、0.168、0.122和0.104,对于ANN模型的测试集,分别为0.684、0.719、0.856、0.784、0.875和0.861。发现使用MLR模型时,特定于类别的模型获得的RMSE低于常规模型。人们发现,使用ANN可以提高通用模型的预测准确性,但对于MLR而言,无法提高针对特定类模型的预测准确性。 (C)2014 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号