首页> 外文期刊>Chemical Senses >Retronasal but Not Oral-Cavity-Only Identification of “Purely Olfactory” Odorants
【24h】

Retronasal but Not Oral-Cavity-Only Identification of “Purely Olfactory” Odorants

机译:鼻后腔而非纯腔内的“纯嗅觉”气味识别

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Identifications of 5 odorants selected to be nontrigeminal stimuli were compared using retronasal and oral-cavity-only (OCO) air-phase presentations, with OCO produced by both exhalation through the mouth and a nose clip that closed the nostrils. Nine identifiers were available on each trial; 1 or 2 were correct for each odorant. Correct retronasal identifications were more common than OCO identifications and exceeded chance across subjects and for each subject; OCO correct identifications did not exceed chance. Retronasal reaction times were briefer than OCO reaction times. Correct retronasal identifications for vanillin, octanoic acid, phenylethyl alcohol, coumarin, and octane were 88%, 73%, 87%, 70%, and 85%, respectively; correct OCO identifications were, respectively, 10%, 12%, 18%, 35%, and 33%. Identifiers selected for retronasally presented odorants differed from those for other retronasally presented odorants, but identifiers for OCO-presented odorants did not differ between odorants. Overall, the retronasal identifications of nontrigeminal odorants both depended upon the odorant that was presented and corresponded to previous reported orthonasal identifications. In contrast, the OCO identifications, characterized by low percentages of correct identifications and an absence of differences between odorants in selected identifiers, suggested that OCO responses to nontrigeminal, purely olfactory odorants lack sufficient sensory information for either correct or differential identification.
机译:使用后鼻腔和仅口腔腔内(OCO)气相色谱法比较了被选为非三叉神经刺激物的5种气味的鉴定,OCO是通过嘴部呼气和闭合鼻孔的鼻夹产生的。每个试验有九个标识符;每种香精的正确率是1或2。正确的鼻后识别比OCO识别更普遍,并且跨受试者以及每个受试者的机会都超过了。 OCO正确的身份证明没有超过机会。鼻后反应时间比OCO反应时间短。香兰素,辛酸,苯乙醇,香豆素和辛烷的正确后鼻鉴别分别为88%,73%,87%,70%和85%。正确的OCO识别分别为10%,12%,18%,35%和33%。为鼻后呈现的气味选择的标识符与其他经鼻呈现的气味的标识符不同,但是OCO呈现的气味的标识符在两种气味之间没有差异。总体而言,非三叉戟加香剂的后鼻识别均取决于所呈现的加香剂,并且与先前报道的鼻加鼻识别相对应。相比之下,OCO识别的特征在于正确识别的百分比低,并且所选标识符中的气味剂之间没有差异,这表明OCO对非三叉,纯嗅觉气味剂的响应缺乏足够的感官信息以进行正确或差异识别。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Chemical Senses》 |2008年第2期|107-118|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Neurobiology and Behavior Cornell University Ithaca NY 14853 USA;

    Department of Psychology Cornell University Ithaca NY 14853 USA;

    Present address: 2023 Foothill Drive Fullerton CA 92833 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号