...
首页> 外文期刊>Challenge >Capital and Control: Lessons from Malaysia
【24h】

Capital and Control: Lessons from Malaysia

机译:资本与控制:马来西亚的经验教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Governments around the world have embraced the thirty-year-old trend toward the free movement of capital. International capital markets have grown to be enormous―$1.2 trillion change hands in global markets every day. The promise of liberalization is an efficient global allocation of savings, with markets channeling financial resources to their most productive uses and increasing economic growth and welfare around the world. Many developing countries jumped on the bandwagon, opening their capital accounts in the hope of borrowing to finance domestic investment and encouraging foreigners to invest directly in their emerging markets. The gains have not come without pain, however, as it has become clear that massive, mobile international capital markets bring risks. The devastating financial crises of the past few years―in Asia, Russia, Brazil, Argentina―have prompted a reappraisal of the costs of liberalization. There are more crises to come. And so a debate about the future of the international financial architecture has emerged. Members of the international financial community are formulating their positions on the appropriate balance to strike between the benefits and risks of global capital markets, as well as the balance between financial market, freedom and a government's ability to manage its own economy.
机译:世界各国政府已经接受了三十年来资本自由流动的趋势。国际资本市场已经变得非常庞大,全球市场每天交易额达1.2万亿美元。自由化的希望是对储蓄进行有效的全球分配,市场将金融资源用于其最有生产力的用途,并在世界范围内促进经济增长和福利。许多发展中国家跃入潮流,开放其资本账户,以期希望借贷为国内投资融资,并鼓励外国人直接在新兴市场投资。然而,取得的成就并非没有痛苦,因为已经清楚的是,庞大的流动性国际资本市场会带来风险。过去几年(在亚洲,俄罗斯,巴西,阿根廷)毁灭性的金融危机促使人们对自由化的成本进行了重新评估。还有更多的危机来临。因此,关于国际金融架构的未来的争论就出现了。国际金融界成员正在制定适当的平衡立场,以权衡全球资本市场的利益和风险,以及金融市场,自由与政府管理自身经济的能力之间的平衡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号