首页> 外文期刊>Cataloging & classification quarterly >Viewing RDA from FRBR and FRAD: Does RDA Represent a Different Conceptual Model?
【24h】

Viewing RDA from FRBR and FRAD: Does RDA Represent a Different Conceptual Model?

机译:从FRBR和FRAD中查看RDA:RDA代表不同的概念模型吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Resource Description and Access (RDA) was analyzed through a comparison between the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD) models and the model that RDA directly reflects. First, it was clarified that RDA adopts the FRBR entities but with some differences, such as the relationship between work and manifestation and the treatment of "title of the expression." Second, for the FRAD scope, a slightly different model that reflects RDA directly was proposed, incorporating the decomposition of FRAD entities as well as a new entity "description."
机译:通过对书目记录功能要求(FRBR)和权限数据功能要求(FRAD)模型与RDA直接反映的模型之间的比较,分析了资源描述和访问(RDA)。首先,需要澄清的是,RDA采用了FRBR实体,但是存在一些差异,例如作品与表现形式之间的关系以及“表达标题”的处理。其次,对于FRAD范围,提出了一个略有不同的模型,该模型直接反映RDA,其中包括FRAD实体的分解以及新的实体“描述”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号