首页> 外文期刊>Cataloging & classification quarterly >Library Linked Data Models: Library Data in the Semantic Web
【24h】

Library Linked Data Models: Library Data in the Semantic Web

机译:图书馆链接数据模型:语义网中的图书馆数据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This exploratory study examined Linked Data (LD) schemas/ ontologies and data models proposed or in use by libraries around the world using MAchine Readable Cataloging (MARC) as a basis for comparison of the scope and extensibility of these potential new standards. The researchers selected 14 libraries from national libraries, academic libraries, government libraries, public libraries, multi-national libraries, and cultural heritage centers currently developing Library Linked Data (LLD) schemas. The choices of models, schemas, and elements used in each library's LD can create interoperability issues for LD services because of substantial differences between schemas and data models evolving via local decisions. The researchers observed that a wide variety of vocabularies and ontologies were used for LLD including common web schemas such as Dublin Core (DC)/DCTerms, Schema.org and Resource Description Framework (RDF), as well as deprecated schemas such as MarcOnt and rdagroup1 elements. A sharp divide existed as well between LLD schemas using variations of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) data model and those with different data models or even with no listed data model. Libraries worldwide are not using the same elements or even the same ontologies, schemas and data models to describe the same materials using the same general concepts.
机译:这项探索性研究使用机器可读目录(MARC)作为比较这些潜在新标准的范围和可扩展性的基础,研究了世界各地图书馆提出或正在使用的链接数据(LD)模式/本体和数据模型。研究人员从国家图书馆,学术图书馆,政府图书馆,公共图书馆,跨国图书馆和文化遗产中心中选择了14个图书馆,这些图书馆目前正在开发图书馆链接数据(LLD)模式。在每个库的LD中使用的模型,模式和元素的选择可能会导致LD服务的互操作性问题,因为模式和通过本地决策演变的数据模型之间存在实质性差异。研究人员观察到,LLD使用了各种各样的词汇和本体,包括常见的Web模式(例如Dublin Core(DC)/DCTerms、Schema.org和Resource Description Framework(RDF))以及已弃用的模式(例如MarcOnt和rdagroup1)元素。使用书目记录功能要求(FRBR)数据模型的变化和具有不同数据模型甚至没有列出数据模型的LLD方案之间,也存在着巨大的分歧。世界各地的图书馆没有使用相同的元素,甚至没有使用相同的本体论,方案和数据模型来描述使用相同一般概念的相同材料。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号