首页> 外文期刊>Carbon Management >Commentary on 'Current economic obstacles to biochar use in agriculture and climate change mitigation' regarding uncertainty, context-specificity and alternative value sources
【24h】

Commentary on 'Current economic obstacles to biochar use in agriculture and climate change mitigation' regarding uncertainty, context-specificity and alternative value sources

机译:关于“不确定性,因地制宜和替代价值来源的“农业中目前使用生物炭的经济障碍和减缓气候变化”的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A recent study in Carbon Management, by Bach etal., argues that biochar amendments' positive impacts on crop yields and soil carbon sequestration have been overestimated, and biochar amendment to soil is hence unlikely to be an economically viable technique for cropping system management or C abatement. We question the data selection and analysis techniques that the authors used to assess the effect of biochar on crop yield, biochar stability in soil, and biochar production cost. Although the research article was not intended as a meta-analysis - and hence the data reported need not be analyzed with the full rigor of a systematic review - we assert that the employed data set, while containing a sufficient quantity of data, requires closer inspection and a more careful interpretation to avoid significant bias in the conclusions. Furthermore, we assert that proper implementation of biochar and inclusion of non-yield benefits in the analysis would render it more economically viable for both cropping system enhancement and C sequestration than portrayed by Bach etal.
机译:Bach等人最近在《碳管理》中的一项研究认为,生物炭改良剂对作物产量和土壤碳固存的积极影响被高估了,因此,对土壤生物炭改良剂不太可能成为种植系统管理或耕作的经济上可行的技术。减排。我们质疑作者用来评估生物炭对作物产量,土壤中生物炭稳定性和生物炭生产成本的影响的数据选择和分析技术。尽管该研究文章并非旨在进行荟萃分析-因此并不需要对系统报告的数据进行全面严格的分析-但我们认为所使用的数据集虽然包含足够的数据量,但也需要进行仔细检查并进行更仔细的解释,以免结论有明显的偏差。此外,我们断言,生物炭的正确实施和分析中非农作物收益的纳入将使其在经济上比巴赫等人描述的更适合种植系统和固碳。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号