首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Public Administration >Evidence and equity: Struggles over federal employment equity policy in Canada, 1984–95
【24h】

Evidence and equity: Struggles over federal employment equity policy in Canada, 1984–95

机译:证据与公平:1984-95年加拿大联邦就业公平政策的斗争

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract: This article traces debates about federal employment equity policy in Canada in the 1980s and 1990s, focusing specifically on the role of data and statistics in policy-making. The authors interpret policy-makers' extensive use of evidence-based policy instruments in the implementation of employment equity as an attempt to offer a technical solution to the deeply politicized problem of workplace discrimination. By exploring policy debates from the Royal Commission on Equality in Employment (the Abella Commission) (1984) to the passage of the reformed Employment Equity Act in 1995, the authors show how recourse to evidence-based deliberation failed to contain political conflict, because the meaning and use of statistical data became the object of political struggle among the main policy stakeholders. The article concludes by considering the implications of this case study for the broader comparative debate on the role of evidence-based methods in policy-making.
机译:摘要:本文追溯了关于1980年代和1990年代加拿大联邦就业公平政策的辩论,重点是数据和统计在政策制定中的作用。作者解释了决策者在实施就业平等中广泛使用基于证据的政策工具,试图为深深政治化的工作场所歧视问题提供技术解决方案。通过探讨皇家就业平等委员会(Abella委员会)(1984)到1995年改革后的《就业平等法》的政策辩论,作者证明了采用循证审议无法遏制政治冲突,因为统计数据的含义和使用成为主要政策利益相关者之间政治斗争的对象。本文的结论是考虑了本案例研究对基于证据的方法在决策中的作用的广泛比较辩论的意义。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Canadian Public Administration》 |2011年第3期|335-357|共23页
  • 作者

    John Grundy; Miriam Smith;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Political Science York University;

    Department of Social Science York University;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号