首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique >Hobbes and Republican Liberty Quentin Skinner Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, pp. 268.
【24h】

Hobbes and Republican Liberty Quentin Skinner Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, pp. 268.

机译:霍布斯和共和党自由昆汀·斯金纳剑桥:剑桥大学出版社,2008年,第268页。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the case of early modern England, fewer scholars have done more to reassess thenhistory of the language of liberty than Quentin Skinner. In his recent book, Hobbesnand Republican Liberty, Skinner argues two points. The first is that Hobbes’s politi-ncal theory is a sustained refutation of the increasingly influential republican concep-ntion of liberty. The second is that Hobbes’s conceptualization of liberty undergoes ansubstantive change between the publication of De Cive in 1642 and Leviathan inn1651 to the point where “Hobbes’s analysis of liberty in Leviathan represents not anrevision but a repudiation of what he had earlier argued” ~xv!. These two points arenrelated insofar as the conception of liberty articulated in Leviathan is a direct responsento the increasing popularity of neo-Roman or republican conceptions of liberty artic-nulated within the context of the civil war and revolution.
机译:就早期的现代英格兰而言,与昆汀·斯金纳相比,更少的学者在重新评估自由语言的历史上做更多的工作。斯金纳在他的最新著作《霍布斯南与共和党的自由》中提出了两点。首先,霍布斯的政治理论是对越来越有影响力的共和主义自由观念的持续反驳。第二个是霍布斯的自由概念在1642年的《 De Cive》出版与Leviathan inn1651之间经历了实质性的变化,以至于“霍布斯对Leviathan中的自由的分析并不代表修订,而是对他先前所主张的否认”。就列维坦所表达的自由概念是对内战和革命背景下所表达的新罗马或共和党自由概念日益普及的直接反应而言,这两点是没有关系的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号