首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Journal of Economics >Property rights on First Nations reserve land
【24h】

Property rights on First Nations reserve land

机译:第一国储备土地的产权

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Abstract This paper examines the economic effects of existing private property rights on First Nations reserves. We focus on three regimes of land tenure: lawful possession, designated land and permits. These land regimes have been used to create individual landholdings and grant secure and transferable rights of use of reserve land. Using confidential census microdata and rich administrative data, we find evidence of a positive relationship between the use of these tenure regimes and homeownership rates, housing conditions and band's public spending. We also observe a positive relationship with average income. However, this last result is driven by the inflow of a non‐Indigenous population not by improvements in Indigenous households’ income or on‐reserve employment. Our findings thus suggest that while reforms to individual property rights on reserve have some positive effects, their scope remains limited and they are unlikely to constitute a transformative tool to alleviate poverty on reserve.
机译:摘要本文探讨了现有私人财产权对第一环保储备的经济影响。我们专注于三个土地权限:合法占有,指定土地和许可证。这些土地制度已被用于创建个人土地,并授予储备土地的安全和可转让的使用权。使用机密人口普查微数据和丰富的行政数据,我们发现这些任期制度和房屋率和房屋条件和乐队公共支出之间的使用与忠实关系之间存在积极关系。我们也观察到平均收入的积极关系。然而,这最后结果是由非土着人口流入而不是通过改善土着家庭收入或储备就业的流入。因此,我们的调查结果表明,虽然对储备的个人财产权的改革有一些积极的影响,但其范围仍然有限,而且它们不太可能构成一种减轻贫困的转型工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号