首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of communication >What Counts as Police Violence? A Case Study of Data in the CATO Institute's Police Misconduct Reporting Project
【24h】

What Counts as Police Violence? A Case Study of Data in the CATO Institute's Police Misconduct Reporting Project

机译:什么算作警察暴力? CATO研究所警察不当举报项目中的数据案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background This article presents a case study about the role of data in the CATO Institute's Police Misconduct Reporting Project and reflects on what constitutes police violence. Analysis Augmenting this data aggregation work, the article turns to additional data projects focused on recording police crime and misconduct to gather a broader understanding of incidents of police violence beyond acts that cause death. Conclusion and implications It is only when we look at data on acts of violence that occur when an officer is on duty and off-duty, with or without a firearm, that a clearer sense of the traumatic cycle of policing can be understood. This way of looking at police data requires both broader practices of "copwatching," as well as a broader definition of what counts as violence.
机译:背景信息本文介绍了有关数据在CATO研究所警察不当行为举报项目中的作用的案例研究,并反思了构成警察暴力的内容。分析作为数据汇总工作的补充,本文转向了其他数据项目,这些项目侧重于记录警察的犯罪和不当行为,以收集对导致死亡的行为以外的警察暴力事件的更广泛了解。结论和意义只有当我们查看有关人员在有或没有枪支的情况下执行值班和下班时发生的暴力行为的数据时,才能更清楚地了解治安的创伤性循环。这种查看警察数据的方式既需要更广泛的“警惕”实践,又需要对暴力行为进行更广泛的定义。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Canadian journal of communication》 |2020年第1期|91-100|共10页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位

    Bournemouth University;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号