Normtek Radiation Services Ltd v. Alberta (Environmental Appeals Board)'

摘要

considering merits of appeal - It was open to Board to prioritize specific requirement of being directly affected over more general wording in s. 95(5) of Act that might allow public interest complaints and Board's dismissal of appeal was reasonable and did not subvert intention of legislature - Board's 16-month delay in issuing reasons for its dismissal of appeal was undesirable but did not breach procedural fairness. The application for judicial review is dismissed. Submissions on costs were made at the hearing. While I appreciate the public aspect to Normtek's submissions, Normtek has a clear economic interest in the outcome of this judicial review. There is no reason to depart from the normal rule. Secure Energy shall have its costs at Column 2 of Schedule C of the Alberta Rules of Court.