...
首页> 外文期刊>Cambridge Review of International Affairs >Assessing the historical turn in IR: an anatomy of second wave historical sociology
【24h】

Assessing the historical turn in IR: an anatomy of second wave historical sociology

机译:评估IR的历史转折:第二波历史社会学剖析

获取原文
           

摘要

This article reassesses what is at stake in the historical turn in international relations (IR) and the attendant debate between the Second Wave of neo-Weberian historical sociology (WHS) and Political Marxism (PM). Firstly, it endeavours to recast what is at stake in the ‘historical turn’ in IR: the critique of reification and chronocentrism. Secondly, it examines WHS's argument against reductionism in the light of Weber's own work. We show how the Weberian dualism between the politics and the economics inhibits its capacity to complete its project of historicizing IR. Finally, it explains why recent Weberian's defence of multicausalism creates even more obstacles on the road towards an ontologically consistent historical turn.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2011.558493
机译:本文重新评估了国际关系(IR)的历史性转折以及伴随第二次新韦伯历史社会学(WHS)与政治马克思主义(PM)之间的辩论所面临的威胁。首先,它努力重塑IR中“历史性转折”中的关键问题:对质化和年代中心主义的批判。其次,它根据韦伯自己的工作研究了世界人道主义峰会反对还原主义的观点。我们展示了政治与经济学之间的韦伯式二元论如何抑制其完成IR历史性项目的能力。最后,它解释了为什么韦伯式的多重因果主义辩护在走向本体论上一致的历史转折的道路上创造了更多的障碍。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = { ,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2011.558493

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号