首页> 外文期刊>Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics >Direct-to-Consumer Advertising: Should There Be a Free Market in Healthcare Information?
【24h】

Direct-to-Consumer Advertising: Should There Be a Free Market in Healthcare Information?

机译:直接面向消费者的广告:医疗保健信息应该有一个自由市场吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

On June 3, 2003, the European Council of health ministers rejected a proposal from the European Commission to allow drug manufacturers to advertise directly to particular groups of patients; the proposal had already been rejected by the European Parliament subsequent to a heated public debate in which consumer and patient groups almost unanimously argued that it was not the role of drug companies to provide information to patients. The pilot scheme suggested by the Commission would only have applied to patients with three chronic diseases, AIDS, diabetes, and asthma, and would, it was argued, not undermine an overall ban. Drug companies would have been required to abide by a special code of conduct and clear any information given to patients—on web sites or in specialized publications—with national authorities.
机译:2003年6月3日,欧洲卫生部长会议拒绝了欧盟委员会的一项提议,该提议允许药品生产商直接向特定的患者群体宣传。在激烈的公开辩论之后,该提案已被欧洲议会拒绝,在该辩论中,消费者和患者团体几乎一致认为,向患者提供信息不是药品公司的职责。委员会建议的试验计划仅适用于患有三种慢性疾病,艾滋病,糖尿病和哮喘的患者,有人认为这不会破坏全面的禁令。药品公司必须遵守特殊的行为准则,并与国家主管部门清除在网站或专业出版物上提供给患者的任何信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号