首页> 外文期刊>Cambridge journal of economics >Limited liability and multinational enterprises: a case for reform?
【24h】

Limited liability and multinational enterprises: a case for reform?

机译:有限责任公司与跨国企业:改革的理由?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In the context of corporate groups, the legal principles of limited liability and corporate separation can lead to injustice in cases of harm to involuntary creditors by externalising risks that ought to be internalised by the enterprise as the better risk taker. The avoidance of responsibility can be achieved by interposing a separate legal entity between the victims and the ultimate controller of the group, be it a parent company or its controlling shareholders. The resulting lack of legal responsibility could be remedied in a number of ways ranging from adaptations of existing exceptions to the doctrine of limited liability to outright abolition of limited liability. Preference is given to a statutory principle of enterprise liability for the controlling entity. The implications of these doctrines are also discussed in relation to the choice of jurisdiction in which to bring a legal action.
机译:在公司集团的背景下,有限责任和公司分离的法律原则在将非自愿债权人损害的情况下,通过将应由企业内部化为更好风险承担者的风险进行外部化,会导致不公正。可以通过在受害者与集团的最终控制人(母公司或其控股股东)之间设置独立的法律实体来避免责任。由此产生的缺乏法律责任的补救办法可以有多种,从对现有例外情况的修改到有限责任学说,到彻底废除有限责任,不等。优先考虑控制实体的企业责任的法定原则。这些原则的含义还与提起法律诉讼的司法管辖区的选择有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号