...
首页> 外文期刊>De Economist >Who Bears the Burden of Social Security Contributions in the Netherlands? Evidence from Dutch Administrative Data
【24h】

Who Bears the Burden of Social Security Contributions in the Netherlands? Evidence from Dutch Administrative Data

机译:谁来承担荷兰的社会保障缴款负担?来自荷兰行政数据的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper sheds light on the incidence of social security contributions (SSC) in the Netherlands. Our unique dataset on earnings inclusive and exclusive of these SSC enables us to apply the methodology by Alvaredo et al. (De Econ. doi:10.1007/s10645-017-9294-710.1007/s10645-017-9294-7" TargetType="DOI", 2017) and draw clear conclusions on local incidence. First, our finding of a smooth distribution of gross earnings indicates that both employer and employee do not shift their contributions. This contradicts the standard incidence prediction of full shifting of SSC to employees but corroborates recent findings. Moreover, it is hard to reconcile with the standard static model of labour supply and demand where gross earnings are irrelevant. Second, our finding of a discontinuity in labour costs supports our conclusion of non-shifting and renders out measurement error as an alternative explanation. Overall, these findings suggest that the statutory split matters and that the burden of SSC close to thresholds is borne by employers.
机译:本文阐明了荷兰的社会保障缴款发生率。我们关于收入包括和不包括这些SSC的独特数据集使我们能够应用Alvaredo等人的方法。 (De Econ。doi:10.1007 / s10645-017-9294-710.1007 / s10645-017-9294-7“ TargetType =” DOI“,2017年)并就当地发生率得出了清晰的结论。首先,我们发现了总收入的平稳分布收入表明雇主和雇员都没有转移其供款,这与将SSC完全转移给雇员的标准发生率预测相矛盾,但证实了最近的发现,此外,很难与标准的静态劳动力供求模型保持一致。其次,我们发现的劳动力成本不连续性支持了我们的不变动结论,并提出了计量误差作为替代解释,总的来说,这些发现表明,法定分割很重要,南南合作的负担接近极限由雇主承担。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号