首页> 外文期刊>Business Ethics >The exteriority of ethics in management and its transition into justice: a Levinasian approach to ethics in business
【24h】

The exteriority of ethics in management and its transition into justice: a Levinasian approach to ethics in business

机译:管理中道德的外部性及其向正义的转变:列维纳斯主义的商业道德方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Levinas did not present any new ethical theories; he did not even give any normative recommendations. But his phenomenological investigations help us to understand how the idea of ethics emerges and how we try to cope with it. The purpose of this paper is to suggest some implications from a reading of Levinas on how ethical challenges are handled within a management perspective. The paper claims that management, both in theory and in practice, is necessarily egocentric and thus ethically biased. Therefore, ethics, denned as the idea that it is possible to do otherwise than pursue one's own interest, must have its source outside the scope of management. Levinas identifies this source as the call for responsibility from the Other, beyond the reach of managerial control. He also suggests how this idea of ethics is put into practice, especially in economic life: the existence of money makes it both possible and necessary to compare unique and incomparable others. Management tools may be used in the service of always more justice, as it also may be used for the opposite purpose. Instead of trying to draw a normative conclusion from Levinas, we may distinguish between two ways of experiencing reality: one through language and knowledge, covering both descriptive and normative knowledge, including 'business ethics', and the other through the particular events of encounters, from where this knowledge is continuously questioned through the call for responsibility, and thereby may provide possibilities for continuous improvements towards always more justice.
机译:列维纳斯没有提出任何新的伦理理论。他甚至没有给出任何规范性建议。但是他的现象学研究帮助我们理解了道德观念如何产生以及我们如何应对这一观念。本文的目的是从列维纳斯的阅读中提出一些有关如何从管理角度处理道德挑战的启示。该论文声称,管理在理论上和实践上都必须以自我为中心,因此在伦理上存在偏见。因此,伦理学被定义为除了追求自己的利益之外还可以做其他事情的想法,其伦理学的来源必须超出管理范围。列维纳斯认为,这一来源是来自他人的责任的呼吁,超出了管理控制的范围。他还建议如何将这种道德观念付诸实践,尤其是在经济生活中:金钱的存在使比较独特和无与伦比的他人成为可能和必要。管理工具可以始终用于更多的正义,也可以用于相反的目的。除了尝试从列维纳斯得出规范性结论外,我们可以区分两种体验现实的方式:一种是通过语言和知识,涵盖描述性和规范性知识,包括“商业道德”,另一种是通过遭遇的特定事件,通过呼吁责任不断地对这些知识进行质疑,从而可能为不断提高公正性提供可能。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Business Ethics》 |2007年第3期|p.220-226|共7页
  • 作者

    Dag G. Aasland;

  • 作者单位

    Economics, Agder University College, Grimstad, Norway;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 贸易经济;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:42:15

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号