首页> 外文期刊>Business & information systems engineering >Why Incorporating a Platform-Intermediary can Increase Crowdsourcees' Engagement: Case-Study Based Insights
【24h】

Why Incorporating a Platform-Intermediary can Increase Crowdsourcees' Engagement: Case-Study Based Insights

机译:为什么合并平台中间人可以增加人群源的参与:基于案例研究的见解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While the crowdsourcer's job is to encourage valuable contributions and sustained commitment in a cost-effective manner, it seems as if the primary attention of management and research is still centered on the evaluation of contributions rather than the crowd. As many crowdsourcers lack the resources to successfully execute such projects, crowdsourcing intermediaries play an increasingly important role. First studies dealt with internal management challenges of incorporating an intermediary. However, the issue of how intermediaries influence crowdsourcees' psychological and behavioral responses, further referred to as engagement, has not been addressed yet. Consequently, two leading research questions guide this paper: (1) How can the engagement process of crowdsourcees be conceptualized? (2) How and why do crowdsourcing intermediaries impact crowdsourcees' engagement? This study extends existing knowledge by offering IS-researchers a process perspective on engagement and exploring the underlying mechanisms and IT-enabled stimuli that foster value-creation in a mediated and non-mediated setting. A theoretical process model is first conceptualized and then explored with insights from two common cases in the growing field of crowd testing. By triangulating platform and interview data, initial propositions concerning the role of specific stimuli and the intermediary within the engagement process are derived. It is proposed that crowdsourcing enterprises, incorporating intermediaries, have the potential to generate a desired engagement state when perceived stimuli under their control belong to the so-called group of "game changers" and "value adders", while the intermediary controls mainly "risk factors" for absorbing negative experiences. Apart from the theoretical relevance of studying mediated engagement processes and explaining voluntary use and participation in a socio-technical system, findings support decisions on how to effectively incorporate platform intermediaries.
机译:虽然众群人的工作是以经济效益的方式鼓励有价值的贡献和持续的承诺,但似乎仍然是管理和研究的主要注意仍然是对贡献而不是人群的评价。由于许多人群缺乏成功执行此类项目的资源,众群中介机构发挥着越来越重要的作用。第一项研究涉及纳入中间人的内部管理挑战。但是,中间人如何影响人群“心理和行为反应”的问题还没有得到解决。因此,两个领先的研究问题指导本文:(1)人群源的参与过程如何概念化? (2)众包中介机构如何以及为什么会影响众群源的参与?本研究通过提供了现有知识,研究人员是关于参与和探索潜在机制的过程视角和启用它的刺激,使其在介导和非介导的环境中促进价值创造。理论上的过程模型首先概念化,然后探讨了来自人群测试的越来越多的常见情况的见解。通过三角化平台和面试数据,推导出关于特定刺激作用和接合过程中的中间体作用的初始命题。拟议众所周境的企业纳入中介机构,当他们的控制下的刺激属于所谓的“游戏变化机”和“价值加法商”时,众所周性的刺激有可能产生所需的参与状态,而中间控制主要是“风险“吸收消极经验”的因素。除了学习介导的参与过程和解释自愿使用和参与社会技术体系的理论相关性之外,调查结果支持有关如何有效纳入平台中介机构的决定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号