首页> 外文期刊>Buses >What the OFT had to say
【24h】

What the OFT had to say

机译:OFT不得不说什么

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In 2008, the Office of Fair Trading decided not to refer Arriva's part-acquisition of KMP to the Competition Commission because it had received 'specific evidence' that another competitor intended to enter the Llandudno-Bangor market, and this was 'sufficient to address any potential substantial lessening of competition arising from the merger'. Given that no such operator has emerged and Arriva's fares on the Llandudno-Bangor corridor are significantly higher than on other Bangor routes, does the OFT believe in hindsight that it made the wrong judgment? OFT spokesman Frank Shepherd responds: 'The OFT does not generally consider whether, in hindsight, its individual merger decisions were 'right' or "wrong' since the decisions taken are taken on the basis of information known to the case team as a result of its investigation.
机译:2008年,公平交易办公室决定不将Arriva对KMP的部分收购移交给竞争委员会,因为它已经收到“具体证据”,表明另一竞争者打算进入兰迪德诺-班戈市场,并且“足以解决任何竞争问题”。合并可能大大减少竞争”。鉴于没有这样的运营商出现,并且Arriva在Llandudno-Bangor走廊上的票价明显高于其他Bangor路线上的票价,OFT是否会后悔认为自己做出了错误的判断? OFT发言人弗兰克·谢泼德(Frank Shepherd)回应说:“事后看来,OFT通常不考虑其个人合并决定是“对”还是“错”,因为所做出的决定是基于案件组所知的信息而做出的。它的调查。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Buses》 |2011年第679期|p.32|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:52:03

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号