首页> 外文期刊>OIML bulletin >Conformity assessment and metrology: Where to go in the future?
【24h】

Conformity assessment and metrology: Where to go in the future?

机译:合格评定和计量:未来的发展方向?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A couple of years ago ISO CASCO launched a major project of transforming all the existing ISO Guides on conformity assessment into a comprehensive series of ISO 17000 standards, which are now,at various stages of development. As the concept of traceability underpinning all measurements has been a basic mission of metrology, a number of these standards have a direct bearing on metrology. The series is logically based on a definition standard, ISO 17000, giving, among others, guidance as to which activities fall under conformity assessment. The fact that calibration does not might have important consequences which must yet be assessed. A controversial discussion on some issues has been in progress concerning ISO 17011 on accreditation bodies which touches both on national metrology institutes (NMIs) with an accreditation function and on calibration laboratories at large. ISO 17040 on peer review could be used with an advantage to support mutual recognition arrangements among a limited number of bodies of a specialized expertise (e.g. CIPM MRA among NMIs under the Metre Convention). ISO 17025 has been the most important standard for the metrology community and it is now undergoing a major overhaul taking on board the uncovered requirements from ISO 9001:2000. These changes might have a great impact on quality systems in laboratories. ISO 9001:2000 can be easily cross-referenced with ISO 17025 but accreditors, in pursuance of their business interests, would prevent it from happening. The author is a member of the corresponding ISO CASCO WG 25 responsible for this revision. We are now confronted with a proliferation of ISO 9000:2000-based standards (clones), some of them requiring accreditation as nearly the only way to demonstrate technical competence (e.g. ISO TS 16949). This paper will discuss alternative ways to achieve that. In general, the paper will give up-to-date information on the developments outlined above and discuss the consequences and further steps from the viewpoint of metrology.
机译:几年前,ISO CASCO发起了一个重大项目,将所有现有的有关合格评定的ISO指南转变为一系列全面的ISO 17000标准,这些标准目前处于各个开发阶段。由于作为所有测量基础的可追溯性概念一直是计量学的基本任务,因此其中许多标准直接关系到计量学。该系列逻辑上基于定义标准ISO 17000,除其他事项外,给出了有关哪些活动属于合格评估的指南。校准没有产生重大后果的事实,必须进行评估。关于ISO 17011认证机构的一些问题正在进行争议性讨论,涉及具有认证功能的国家计量机构(NMI)和整个校准实验室。可以使用ISO 17040的同行评审优势来支持有限数量的专门知识机构之间的相互认可安排(例如,根据《电表公约》在NMI中的CIPM MRA)。 ISO 17025一直是计量界最重要的标准,并且正在对ISO 9001:2000中未发现的要求进行重大检查。这些变化可能会对实验室的质量体系产生重大影响。 ISO 9001:2000可以很容易地与ISO 17025相互参照,但是认证机构根据其商业利益,可以阻止它的发生。作者是负责此修订的相应ISO CASCO WG 25的成员。现在,我们面临着基于ISO 9000:2000的标准(克隆)的泛滥,其中一些要求认证几乎是证明技术能力的唯一方法(例如ISO TS 16949)。本文将讨论实现该目标的替代方法。通常,本文将提供有关上述发展的最新信息,并从计量学的角度讨论后果和进一步的措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号