首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America >A Logical Methodology for Archaeoseismology: A Proof of Concept at the Archaeological Site of Sagalassos, Southwest Turkey
【24h】

A Logical Methodology for Archaeoseismology: A Proof of Concept at the Archaeological Site of Sagalassos, Southwest Turkey

机译:考古地震学的逻辑方法论:土耳其西南部萨加拉索斯考古遗址的概念证明

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Archaeoseismology is currently controversial, with criticisms over the extent to which this research field can contribute to seismic-hazard analysis and, indeed, as to whether man-made structures can be used as earthquake indicators at all. Addressing these concerns—in other words, refining the utility of archaeologically derived earthquake information to permit its inclusion in earthquake-hazard assessments—requires first a systematic, quantitative, and interdisciplinary approach to the seismocultural record. Here, we modify a semiquantitative logic-tree formalism developed for palaeoseismology to explore a methodological scheme that can track uncertainties in successive stages of archaeoseismological investigation. The end result of our logic-tree formalism is a value that expresses the level of certainty to which an archaeological site has recorded a palaeoearthquake and thus reflects its relative significance with respect to a seismic-hazard analysis; we call this measure the archaeoseismic quality factor (AQF). nnWe illustrate how the methodological scheme might work by applying it to Sagalassos in southwest Turkey, an archaeological site for which earthquake effects are extensively reported. The resulting AQF that we derive from our critical review of the Sagalassos dataset is currently meaningless, because comparable values from equivalent reappraisals of earthquake evidence at other archaeological sites are needed for its relative significance to be appreciated. Nevertheless, the varying levels of uncertainty that we assign for different stages in the logic tree allow us to identify key weaknesses in the earthquake hypothesis at Sagalassos, deficiencies that might be redressed through future investigations onsite. The logic-tree formalism offers the potential of a standardized procedure to compile, categorize, and evaluate archaeoseismological information in a form that might, with refinement from wider earthquake archaeology studies, be appropriate for seismic-hazard analysis.
机译:考古地震学当前是有争议的,人们对该考古学领域在多大程度上可以促进地震危险性分析以及实际上是否可以将人造结构用作地震指示物的批评。要解决这些问题,换句话说,就是要完善从考古中提取的地震信息的实用性,以便将其纳入地震危险性评估中,首先需要对地震文化记录采取系统,定量和跨学科的方法。在这里,我们修改了为古地震学开发的半定量逻辑树形式主义,以探索可以追踪考古地震学连续阶段不确定性的方法学方案。我们逻辑树形式主义的最终结果是一个值,该值表示考古现场已记录古地震的确定性水平,因此反映了其在地震危险性分析方面的相对重要性;我们称此度量为考古抗震品质因数(AQF)。 nn我们通过将方法学方案应用于土耳其西南部的Sagalassos(该考古现场广泛报道了地震影响)来说明该方法学方案如何工作。我们从对Sagalassos数据集的批判性审查中得出的最终AQF目前没有任何意义,因为需要对来自其他考古现场的地震证据进行同等的重新评估得出可比的值,才能欣赏其相对重要性。尽管如此,我们为逻辑树的不同阶段分配的不确定性水平各不相同,这使我们能够确定Sagalassos地震假说中的关键弱点,这些不足之处可以通过将来的现场调查来弥补。逻辑树形式主义提供了一种标准化程序的潜力,可以以一种形式进行编译,分类和评估考古信息,经过更广泛的地震考古研究的改进,该形式可能适用于地震灾害分析。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America》 |2008年第5期|p.2209-2230|共22页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium manuel.sintubin@ees.kuleuven.be School of Earth, Ocean and Environmental Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA, U.K. istewart@plymouth.ac.uk;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号