...
首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America >Nonlinear Ground-Response Analysis of Turkey Flat Shallow Stiff-Soil Site to Strong Ground Motion
【24h】

Nonlinear Ground-Response Analysis of Turkey Flat Shallow Stiff-Soil Site to Strong Ground Motion

机译:土耳其平面浅层刚土对强地震动的非线性地面响应分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Blind predictions of ground response at the Turkey Flat vertical array site during the 2004 Parkfield earthquake were performed using a series of nonlinear and equivalent-linear ground-response analysis codes. In this article, we report the outcome of the blind predictions, compare the predictions to measurements (released after the predictions were made), and provide discussion on residuals between the data and model predictions. The prediction exercise considered various sources of material variability and model variability. Specifically, these analyses utilized five different nonlinear analysis codes, each exercised with a suite of small-strain shear-wave velocity profiles and modulus reduction/damping curves that encompass the range of reported material properties. Below the site frequency of about 5 Hz, velocity profile variability dominates the computed response variability. Upon full release of strong-motion data from the site, the predictions were generally found to be biased towards underprediction at high frequencies. Sensitivity analyses and results of recent geophysical testing at the site suggest this underprediction bias is most likely a result of inaccuracies in prior estimates of near-surface shear-wave velocities. Analyses performed with the recent profile show no significant bias except at the site frequency, where the response is overpredicted.
机译:使用一系列非线性和等效线性地面响应分析代码对2004年Parkfield地震期间土耳其Flat垂直阵列站点的地面响应进行了盲目预测。在本文中,我们报告了盲目预测的结果,将预测与度量(在做出预测后发布)进行了比较,并提供了关于数据与模型预测之间的残差的讨论。预测工作考虑了物质变异性和模型变异性的各种来源。具体来说,这些分析利用了五个不同的非线性分析代码,每个代码都具有一系列小应变剪切波速度曲线和模量减小/阻尼曲线,这些曲线涵盖了所报告材料特性的范围。在大约5 Hz的站点频率以下,速度分布的可变性主导了计算的响应可变性。在从站点完全释放强运动数据后,通常会发现预测偏向于高频率下的低预测。敏感性分析和该地点最近的地球物理测试结果表明,这种预测不足的偏差很可能是由于近地表剪切波速度先前估算的不准确所致。使用最近的配置文件进行的分析显示,除了站点频率(响应被过度预测)外,没有明显的偏差。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America》 |2008年第1期|p.331-343|共13页
  • 作者单位

    Annie O. L. Kwok Praad Geotechnical, Inc., 5465 South Centinela Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90066-6942 Jonathan P. Stewart Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, 5731 Boelter Hall, Los Angeles, California 90095 jstewart@seas.ucla.edu Youssef M. A. Hashash Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 205 N. Mathews Avenue, Urbana, Illinois 61801;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号